Boost then Convolve: Gradient Boosting Meets Graph Neural Networks
Sergei Ivanov, Liudmila Prokhorenkova
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful models that have been successful in various graph representation learning tasks. Whereas gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) often outperform other machine learning methods when faced with heterogeneous tabular data. But what approach should be used for graphs with tabular node features? Previous GNN models have mostly focused on networks with homogeneous sparse features and, as we show, are suboptimal in the heterogeneous setting. In this work, we propose a novel architecture that trains GBDT and GNN jointly to get the best of both worlds: the GBDT model deals with heterogeneous features, while GNN accounts for the graph structure. Our model benefits from end-to-end optimization by allowing new trees to fit the gradient updates of GNN. With an extensive experimental comparison to the leading GBDT and GNN models, we demonstrate a significant increase in performance on a variety of graphs with tabular features. The code is available: https://github.com/nd7141/bgnn.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b81f1e7e-745f-4068-8adf-73f178bc4971Cited by top-tier papers15
- Graph-less Neural Networks: Teaching Old MLPs New Tricks Via DistillationShichang Zhang, Yozen Liu, Yizhou Sun, Neil ShahICLR 2022 · 234 citations
- ARC: A Generalist Graph Anomaly Detector with In-Context LearningYixin Liu, Shiyuan Li, Yu Zheng, Qingfeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 73 citations
- PonziGuard: Detecting Ponzi Schemes on Ethereum with Contract Runtime Behavior Graph (CRBG)Ruichao Liang, Jing Chen, Kun He, Yueming Wu et al.ICSE 2024 · 60 citations
- ReconBoost: Boosting Can Achieve Modality ReconcilementCong Hua, Qianqian Xu, Shilong Bao, Zhiyong Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 52 citations
- Federated IoT Interaction Vulnerability AnalysisGuangjing Wang, Hanqing Guo, Anran Li, Xiaorui Liu et al.ICDE 2023 · 20 citations
Builds on11
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural NetworksWeihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,744 citations
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine LearningHarmanpreet Kaur, Harsha Nori, Samuel Jenkins, Rich Caruana et al.CHI 2020 · 541 citations
- Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular DataSergei Popov, Stanislav Morozov, Artem BabenkoICLR 2020 · 407 citations
Related papers
- Does your graph need a confidence boost? Convergent boosted smoothing on graphs with tabular node featuresJiuhai Chen, Jonas Mueller, Vassilis N. Ioannidis, Soji Adeshina et al.ICLR 2022 · 13 citations
- T2G-FORMER: Organizing Tabular Features into Relation Graphs Promotes Heterogeneous Feature InteractionJiahuan Yan, Jintai Chen, Yixuan Wu, Danny Z. Chen et al.AAAI 2023 · 60 citations
- Heterogeneous Graph Structure Learning for Graph Neural NetworksJianan Zhao, Xiao Wang, Chuan Shi, Binbin Hu et al.AAAI 2021 · 306 citations
- TabGLM: Tabular Graph Language Model for Learning Transferable Representations Through Multi-Modal Consistency MinimizationAnay Majee, Maria Xenochristou, Wei-Peng ChenAAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- GRANDE: Gradient-Based Decision Tree Ensembles for Tabular DataSascha Marton, Stefan Lüdtke, Christian Bartelt, Heiner StuckenschmidtICLR 2024 · 13 citations
