PonziGuard: Detecting Ponzi Schemes on Ethereum with Contract Runtime Behavior Graph (CRBG)
Ruichao Liang, Jing Chen, Kun He, Yueming Wu, Gelei Deng, Ruiying Du, Cong Wu
Abstract
Ponzi schemes, a form of scam, have been discovered in Ethereum smart contracts in recent years, causing massive financial losses. Rule-based detection approaches rely on pre-defined rules with limited capabilities and domain knowledge dependency. Additionally, using static information like opcodes and transactions for machine learning models fails to effectively characterize the Ponzi contracts, resulting in poor reliability and interpretability. In this paper, we propose PonziGuard, an efficient Ponzi scheme detection approach based on contract runtime behavior. Inspired by the observation that a contract's runtime behavior is more effective in disguising Ponzi contracts from the innocent contracts, Ponzi-Guard establishes a comprehensive graph representation called contract runtime behavior graph (CRBG), to accurately depict the behavior of Ponzi contracts. Furthermore, it formulates the detection process as a graph classification task, enhancing its overall effectiveness. We conducted comparative experiments on a groundtruth dataset and applied PonziGuard to Ethereum Mainnet. The results show that PonziGuard outperforms the current state-of-theart approaches and is also effective in open environments. Using PonziGuard, we have identified 805 Ponzi contracts on Ethereum Mainnet, which have resulted in an estimated economic loss of 281,700 Ether or approximately $500 million USD. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Software security engineering; Malware and its mitigation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 422f5e4a-e3ed-4cfb-8f4e-8ec3beb6e52aCited by top-tier papers3
- TokenScout: Early Detection of Ethereum Scam Tokens via Temporal Graph LearningCong Wu, Jing Chen, Ziming Zhao, Kun He et al.CCS 2024 · 35 citations
- Semantic Sleuth: Identifying Ponzi Contracts via Large Language ModelsCong Wu, Jing Chen, Ziwei Wang, Ruichao Liang et al.ASE 2024 · 29 citations
- Recasting Type Hints from WebAssembly ContractsKunsong Zhao, Zihao Li, Weimin Chen, Xiapu Luo et al.FSE 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on7
- Large-Scale Representation Learning on Graphs via BootstrappingShantanu Thakoor, Corentin Tallec, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mehdi Azabou et al.ICLR 2022 · 311 citations
- Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy AttacksMichael Rodler, Wenting Li, Ghassan O. Karame, Lucas DaviNDSS 2019 · 298 citations
- Learning to Fuzz from Symbolic Execution with Application to Smart ContractsJingxuan He, Mislav Balunovic, Nodar Ambroladze, Petar Tsankov et al.CCS 2019 · 288 citations
- sFuzz: an efficient adaptive fuzzer for solidity smart contractsTai D. Nguyen, Long H. Pham, Jun Sun, Yun Lin et al.ICSE 2020 · 260 citations
- Labeling Trick: A Theory of Using Graph Neural Networks for Multi-Node Representation LearningMuhan Zhang, Pan Li, Yinglong Xia, Kai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 255 citations
Related papers
- Dissecting Payload-based Transaction Phishing on EthereumZhuo Chen, Yufeng Hu, Bowen He, Dong Luo et al.NDSS 2025
- Phishing in Wonderland: Evaluating Learning-Based Ethereum Phishing Transaction Detection and PitfallsAhod Alghuried, David MohaisenNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- TTAGN: Temporal Transaction Aggregation Graph Network for Ethereum Phishing Scams DetectionSijia Li, Gaopeng Gou, Chang Liu, Chengshang Hou et al.WWW 2022 · 156 citations
- Enhancing Smart Contract Security Analysis with Execution Property GraphsKaihua Qin, Zhe Ye, Zhun Wang, Weilin Li et al.ISSTA 2025 · 1 citation
- BERT4ETH: A Pre-trained Transformer for Ethereum Fraud DetectionSihao Hu, Zhen Zhang, Bingqiao Luo, Shengliang Lu et al.WWW 2023 · 97 citations
