Evading the Simplicity Bias: Training a Diverse Set of Models Discovers Solutions with Superior OOD Generalization
Damien Teney, Ehsan Abbasnejad, Simon Lucey, Anton van den Hengel
Abstract
Neural networks trained with SGD were recently shown to rely preferentially on linearly-predictive features and can ignore complex, equally-predictive ones. This simplicity bias can explain their lack of robustness out of distribution (OOD). The more complex the task to learn, the more likely it is that statistical artifacts (i.e. selection biases, spurious correlations) are simpler than the mechanisms to learn.
We demonstrate that the simplicity bias can be mitigated and OOD generalization improved. We train a set of similar models to fit the data in different ways using a penalty on the alignment of their input gradients. We show theoretically and empirically that this induces the learning of more complex predictive patterns.
OOD generalization fundamentally requires information beyond i.i.d. examples, such as multiple training environments, counterfactual examples, or other side information.
Our approach shows that we can defer this requirement to an independent model selection stage. We obtain SOTA results in visual recognition on biased data and generalization across visual domains. The method -the first to evade the simplicity bias -highlights the need for a better understanding and control of inductive biases in deep learning.
Addendum (09-2022): we subsequently used the method in [75] and extended it in [76] to require fewer models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b7b961a7-c355-4c32-aa1c-85c94b28cee4Cited by top-tier papers46
- Fishr: Invariant Gradient Variances for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationAlexandre Ramé, Corentin Dancette, Matthieu CordICML 2022 · 262 citations
- On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious CorrelationsPavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Nate Gruver, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2022 · 208 citations
- Diverse Weight Averaging for Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationAlexandre Ramé, Matthieu Kirchmeyer, Thibaud Rahier, Alain Rakotomamonjy et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 183 citations
- Competency Problems: On Finding and Removing Artifacts in Language DataMatt Gardner, William Merrill, Jesse Dodge, Matthew E. Peters et al.EMNLP 2021 · 72 citations
- On the Foundations of Shortcut LearningKatherine L. Hermann, Hossein Mobahi, Thomas Fel, Michael Curtis MozerICLR 2024 · 72 citations
Builds on27
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- In Search of Lost Domain GeneralizationIshaan Gulrajani, David Lopez-PazICLR 2021 · 1,416 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural NetworksHarshay Shah, Kaustav Tamuly, Aditi Raghunathan, Prateek Jain et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 503 citations
- Episodic Training for Domain GeneralizationDa Li, Jianshu Zhang, Yongxin Yang, Cong Liu et al.ICCV 2019 · 488 citations
Related papers
- Simplicity Bias of Two-Layer Networks beyond Linearly Separable DataNikita Tsoy, Nikola KonstantinovICML 2024 · 12 citations
- DIVE: Subgraph Disagreement for Graph Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationXin Sun, Liang Wang, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu et al.KDD 2024 · 6 citations
- Feature Contamination: Neural Networks Learn Uncorrelated Features and Fail to GeneralizeTianren Zhang, Chujie Zhao, Guanyu Chen, Yizhou Jiang et al.ICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Feature Reconstruction From Outputs Can Mitigate Simplicity Bias in Neural NetworksSravanti Addepalli, Anshul Nasery, Venkatesh Babu Radhakrishnan, Praneeth Netrapalli et al.ICLR 2023
- Systematic generalisation with group invariant predictionsFaruk Ahmed, Yoshua Bengio, Harm van Seijen, Aaron C. CourvilleICLR 2021 · 23 citations
