Two Heads are Actually Better than One: Towards Better Adversarial Robustness via Transduction and Rejection
Nils Palumbo, Yang Guo, Xi Wu, Jiefeng Chen, Yingyu Liang, Somesh Jha
Abstract
Both transduction and rejection have emerged as important techniques for defending against adversarial perturbations. A recent work by (Goldwasser et al., 2020) showed that rejection combined with transduction can give provable guarantees (for certain problems) that cannot be achieved otherwise. Nevertheless, under recent strong adversarial attacks (GMSA (Chen et al., 2022)), Goldwasser et al.'s work was shown to have low performance in a practical deep-learning setting. In this paper, we take a step towards realizing the promise of transduction+rejection in more realistic scenarios. Our key observation is that a novel application of a reduction technique in (Tramèr, 2022) , which was until now only used to demonstrate the vulnerability of certain defenses, can be used to actually construct effective defenses. Theoretically, we show that a careful application of this technique in the transductive setting can give significantly improved sample-complexity for robust generalization. Our theory guides us to design a new transductive algorithm for learning a selective model; extensive experiments using state of the art attacks (AutoAttack, GMSA) show that our approach provides significantly better robust accuracy (81.6% on CIFAR-10 and 57.9% on CIFAR-100 under l ∞ with budget 8/255) than existing techniques (Croce et al., 2020). The implementation is available at https://github.com/ nilspalumbo/transduction-rejection .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b7544ed7-386b-4ffa-89fb-59f840042c56Builds on12
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example DefensesFlorian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Wieland Brendel, Aleksander MadryNeurIPS 2020 · 1,026 citations
- Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial TrainingZekai Wang, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Min Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 300 citations
- Confidence-Calibrated Adversarial Training: Generalizing to Unseen AttacksDavid Stutz, Matthias Hein, Bernt SchieleICML 2020 · 158 citations
Related papers
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks Learned by TransductionJiefeng Chen, Xi Wu, Yang Guo, Yingyu Liang et al.ICLR 2022 · 19 citations
- Stratified Adversarial Robustness with RejectionJiefeng Chen, Jayaram Raghuram, Jihye Choi, Xi Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 4 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples ApartTianyu Pang, Huishuai Zhang, Di He, Yinpeng Dong et al.CVPR 2022 · 13 citations
- Efficient Adversarial Training With Transferable Adversarial ExamplesHaizhong Zheng, Ziqi Zhang, Juncheng Gu, Honglak Lee et al.CVPR 2020
