How Does Critical Batch Size Scale in Pre-training?
Hanlin Zhang, Depen Morwani, Nikhil Vyas, Jingfeng Wu, Difan Zou, Udaya Ghai, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. Kakade
Abstract
Training large-scale models under given resources requires careful design of parallelism strategies. In particular, the efficiency notion of critical batch size (CBS), concerning the compromise between time and compute, marks the threshold beyond which greater data parallelism leads to diminishing returns. To operationalize it, we propose a measure of CBS and pre-train a series of auto-regressive language models, ranging from 85 million to 1.2 billion parameters, on the C4 dataset. Through extensive hyper-parameter sweeps and careful control of factors such as batch size, momentum, and learning rate along with its scheduling, we systematically investigate the impact of scale on CBS. Then we fit scaling laws with respect to model and data sizes to decouple their effects. Overall, our results demonstrate that CBS scales primarily with data size rather than model size, a finding we justify theoretically through the analysis of infinite-width limits of neural networks and infinite-dimensional least squares regression. Of independent interest, we highlight the importance of common hyper-parameter choices and strategies for studying large-scale pre-training beyond fixed training durations. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b5da1ea5-fd8b-4195-bf82-9fbad0860fd3Cited by top-tier papers17
- Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find ThemKaiyue Wen, David Leo Wright Hall, Tengyu Ma, Percy LiangICLR 2026 · 92 citations
- In Search of Adam's Secret SauceAntonio Orvieto, Robert GowerNeurIPS 2025 · 43 citations
- Critical Batch Size Revisited: A Simple Empirical Approach to Large-Batch Language Model TrainingWilliam Merrill, Shane Arora, Dirk Groeneveld, Hanna HajishirziNeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- The Potential of Second-Order Optimization for LLMs: A Study with Full Gauss-NewtonNatalie Abreu, Nikhil Vyas, Sham M. Kakade, Depen MorwaniICLR 2026 · 21 citations
- WSM: Decay-Free Learning Rate Schedule via Checkpoint Merging for LLM Pre-trainingChangxin Tian, jiapeng wang, Qian Zhao, Kunlong Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
Builds on22
- Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion ParametersMostafa Dehghani, Josip Djolonga, Basil Mustafa, Piotr Padlewski et al.ICML 2023 · 848 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
- An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model trainingJordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 566 citations
- Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural NetworksGreg Yang, Edward J. HuICML 2021 · 242 citations
- The Road Less ScheduledAaron Defazio, Xingyu Yang, Ahmed Khaled, Konstantin Mishchenko et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 208 citations
Related papers
- Power Lines: Scaling laws for weight decay and batch size in LLM pre-trainingShane Bergsma, Nolan Dey, Gurpreet Gosal, Gavia Gray et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 44 citations
- Fast Catch-Up, Late Switching: Optimal Batch Size Scheduling via Functional Scaling LawsJinbo Wang, Binghui Li, Zhanpeng Zhou, Mingze Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Breaking Language Barriers: Cross-Lingual Continual Pre-Training at ScaleWenzhen Zheng, Wenbo Pan, Xu Xu, Libo Qin et al.EMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Pre-training under infinite computeKonwoo Kim, Suhas Kotha, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2026 · 25 citations
- To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-CrisisFuzhao Xue, Yao Fu, Wangchunshu Zhou, Zangwei Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 149 citations
