Investigating Pedagogical Teacher and Student LLM Agents: Genetic Adaptation Meets Retrieval-Augmented Generation Across Learning Styles
Debdeep Sanyal, Agniva Maiti, Umakanta Maharana, Dhruv Kumar, Ankur Mali, C. Lee Giles, Murari Mandal
Abstract
Effective teaching requires adapting instructional strategies to accommodate the diverse cognitive and behavioral profiles of students, a persistent challenge in education and teacher training. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promise as tools to simulate such complex pedagogical environments, current simulation frameworks are limited in two key respects: (1) they often reduce students to static knowledge profiles, and (2) they lack adaptive mechanisms for modeling teachers who evolve their strategies in response to student feedback. To address these gaps, we introduce a novel simulation framework that integrates LLM-based heterogeneous student agents with a self-optimizing teacher agent. The teacher agent's pedagogical policy is dynamically evolved using a genetic algorithm, allowing it to discover and refine effective teaching strategies based on the aggregate performance of diverse learners. In addition, we propose Persona-RAG, a Retrieval Augmented Generation module that enables student agents to retrieve knowledge tailored to their individual learning styles. Persona-RAG preserves the retrieval accuracy of standard RAG baselines while enhancing personalization, an essential factor in modeling realistic educational scenarios. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate how our framework supports the emergence of distinct and interpretable teaching patterns when interacting with varied student populations. Our results highlight the potential of LLM-driven simulations to inform adaptive teaching practices and provide a testbed for training human educators in controlled, data-driven environments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance LabelsLuyu Gao, Xueguang Ma, Jimmy Lin, Jamie CallanACL 2023 · 211 citations
- Navigate through Enigmatic Labyrinth A Survey of Chain of Thought Reasoning: Advances, Frontiers and FutureZheng Chu, Jingchang Chen, Qianglong Chen, Weijiang Yu et al.ACL 2024 · 36 citations
- The Art of SOCRATIC QUESTIONING: Recursive Thinking with Large Language ModelsJingyuan Qi, Zhiyang Xu, Ying Shen, Minqian Liu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 20 citations
- TutorUp: What If Your Students Were Simulated? Training Tutors to Address Engagement Challenges in Online LearningSitong Pan, Robin Schmucker, Bernardo García Bulle Bueno, Salome Aguilar Llanes et al.CHI 2025 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Personality-aware Student Simulation for Conversational Intelligent Tutoring SystemsZhengyuan Liu, Stella Xin Yin, Geyu Lin, Nancy F. ChenEMNLP 2024 · 13 citations
- Agent4Edu: Generating Learner Response Data by Generative Agents for Intelligent Education SystemsWeibo Gao, Qi Liu, Linan Yue, Fangzhou Yao et al.AAAI 2025 · 40 citations
- TeachTune: Reviewing Pedagogical Agents Against Diverse Student Profiles with Simulated StudentsHyoungwook Jin, Minju Yoo, Jeongeon Park, Yokyung Lee et al.CHI 2025 · 58 citations
- LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific DiscoveryPingchuan Ma, Tsun-Hsuan Wang, Minghao Guo, Zhiqing Sun et al.ICML 2024 · 76 citations
- Implicit Behavioral Alignment of Language Agents in High-Stakes Crowd SimulationsYunzhe Wang, Gale M. Lucas, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, Volkan UstunEMNLP 2025
