Generative Echo Chamber? Effect of LLM-Powered Search Systems on Diverse Information Seeking
Nikhil Sharma, Q. Vera Liao, Ziang Xiao
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) powered conversational search systems have already been used by hundreds of millions of people, and are believed to bring many benefits over conventional search. However, while decades of research and public discourse interrogated the risk of search systems in increasing selective exposure and creating echo chambers—limiting exposure to diverse opinions and leading to opinion polarization, little is known about such a risk of LLM-powered conversational search. We conduct two experiments to investigate: 1) whether and how LLM-powered conversational search increases selective exposure compared to conventional search; 2) whether and how LLMs with opinion biases that either reinforce or challenge the user’s view change the effect. Overall, we found that participants engaged in more biased information querying with LLM-powered conversational search, and an opinionated LLM reinforcing their views exacerbated this bias. These results present critical implications for the development of LLMs and conversational search systems, and the policy governing these technologies.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b553472c-96b0-4d24-ac3d-307d6a137b29Cited by top-tier papers39
- Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and InconsistenciesSunnie S. Y. Kim, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Q. Vera Liao, Tania Lombrozo et al.CHI 2025 · 118 citations
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- Division-of-Thoughts: Harnessing Hybrid Language Model Synergy for Efficient On-Device AgentsChenyang Shao, Xinyuan Hu, Yutang Lin, Fengli XuWWW 2025 · 31 citations
- Exploring Collaboration Patterns and Strategies in Human-AI Co-creation through the Lens of Agency: A Scoping Review of the Top-tier HCI LiteratureShuning Zhang, Hui Wang, Xin YiCSCW 2025 · 31 citations
Related papers
- Effects of LLM-based Search on Decision Making: Speed, Accuracy, and OverrelianceSofia Eleni Spatharioti, David M. Rothschild, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. HofmanCHI 2025 · 28 citations
- LLM-box vs. Thinking-box: Designing for Deliberate User Engagement with Distorted Information in Conversational SearchSohyun Park, Tak Yeon Lee, Woohun LeeCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-MakingJillian Fisher, Shangbin Feng, Robert Aron, Thomas Richardson et al.ACL 2025
- See Widely, Think Wisely: Toward Designing a Generative Multi-agent System to Burst Filter BubblesYu Zhang, Jingwei Sun, Li Feng, Cen Yao et al.CHI 2024 · 38 citations
- The Lock-in Hypothesis: Stagnation by AlgorithmTianyi Qiu, Zhonghao He, Tejasveer Chugh, Max Kleiman-WeinerICML 2025
