PreCurious: How Innocent Pre-Trained Language Models Turn into Privacy Traps
Ruixuan Liu, Tianhao Wang, Yang Cao, Li Xiong
Abstract
The pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm has demonstrated its effectiveness and has become the standard approach for tailoring language models to various tasks. Currently, community-based platforms offer easy access to various pre-trained models, as anyone can publish without strict validation processes. However, a released pre-trained model can be a privacy trap for fine-tuning datasets if it is carefully designed. In this work, we propose PreCurious framework to reveal the new attack surface where the attacker releases the pre-trained model and gets a black-box access to the final fine-tuned model. PreCurious aims to escalate the general privacy risk of both membership inference and data extraction on the fine-tuning dataset. The key intuition behind PreCurious is to manipulate the memorization stage of the pre-trained model and guide fine-tuning with a seemingly legitimate configuration. While empirical and theoretical evidence suggests that parameter-efficient and differentially private fine-tuning techniques can defend against privacy attacks on a fine-tuned model, PreCurious demonstrates the possibility of breaking up this invulnerability in a stealthy manner compared to fine-tuning on a benign pre-trained model. While DP provides some mitigation for membership inference attack, by further leveraging a sanitized dataset, PreCurious demonstrates potential vulnerabilities for targeted data extraction even under differentially private tuning with a strict privacy budget e.g. <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">mml:miϵ</mml:mi> mml:mo=</mml:mo> mml:mn0.05</mml:mn></mml:math> . Thus, PreCurious raises warnings for users on the potential risks of downloading pre-trained models from unknown sources, relying solely on tutorials or common-sense defenses, and releasing sanitized datasets even after perfect scrubbing.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b48343b0-6e9a-4c62-b344-9b0c1d4aeaebCited by top-tier papers10
- Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine LearningMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Emiliano De CristofaroNeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Forget to Flourish: Leveraging Machine-Unlearning on Pretrained Language Models for Privacy LeakageMd. Rafi Ur Rashid, Jing Liu, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Ye Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 17 citations
- Your Compiler is Backdooring Your Model: Understanding and Exploiting Compilation Inconsistency Vulnerabilities in Deep Learning CompilersSimin Chen, Jinjun Peng, Yixin He, Junfeng Yang et al.S&P 2026 · 11 citations
- Be Careful When Fine-tuning On Open-Source LLMs: Your Fine-tuning Data Could Be Secretly Stolen!Zhexin Zhang, Yuhao Sun, Junxiao Yang, Shiyao Cui et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Beyond Indistinguishability: Measuring Extraction Risk in LLM APIsRuixuan Liu, David Evans, Li XiongS&P 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on26
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
Related papers
- Quantifying Privacy Risks of Prompts in Visual Prompt LearningYixin Wu, Rui Wen, Michael Backes, Pascal Berrang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language ModelsBartlomiej Marek, Lorenzo Rossi, Vincent Hanke, Xun Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- SOFT: Selective Data Obfuscation for Protecting LLM Fine-tuning against Membership Inference AttacksKaiyuan Zhang, Siyuan Cheng, Hanxi Guo, Yuetian Chen et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Powerful Training-Free Membership Inference Against Fine-Tuned Autoregressive Language ModelsDavid Ilic, David Stanojevic, Kostadin CvejoskiACL 2026
- Rigging the Foundation: Manipulating Pre-training for Advanced Membership Inference AttacksZihao Wang, Rui Zhu, Zhikun Zhang, Haixu Tang et al.S&P 2025
