Be Careful When Fine-tuning On Open-Source LLMs: Your Fine-tuning Data Could Be Secretly Stolen!
Zhexin Zhang, Yuhao Sun, Junxiao Yang, Shiyao Cui, Yuanchao Zhang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
Abstract
Fine-tuning on open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) with proprietary data is now a standard practice for downstream developers to obtain task-specific LLMs. Surprisingly, we reveal a new and concerning risk along with the practice: the creator of the open-source LLMs can later extract the private downstream fine-tuning data through simple backdoor training, only requiring black-box access to the fine-tuned downstream model. Our comprehensive experiments, across 4 popularly used open-source models with 3B to 32B parameters and 2 downstream datasets, suggest that the extraction performance can be strikingly high: in practical settings, as much as 76.3% downstream fine-tuning data (queries) out of a total 5,000 samples can be perfectly extracted, and the success rate can increase to 94.9% in more ideal settings. We also explore a detection-based defense strategy but find it can be bypassed with improved attack. Overall, we highlight the emergency of this newly identified data breaching risk in fine-tuning, and we hope that more follow-up research could push the progress of addressing this concerning risk. The code and data used in our experiments are released at https://github.com/thu-coai/Backdoor-Data-Extraction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d265b7cc-4502-4b27-bf10-b2bb4b9e965dBuilds on24
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
Related papers
- Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained ModelsYuxin Wen, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong, Jonas Geiping et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- Are Your LLM-based Text-to-SQL Models Secure? Exploring SQL Injection via Backdoor AttacksMeiyu Lin, Haichuan Zhang, Jiale Lao, Renyuan Li et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 4 citations
- Differentiation-Based Extraction of Proprietary Data from Fine-Tuned LLMsZongjie Li, Daoyuan Wu, Shuai Wang, Zhendong SuCCS 2025 · 1 citation
- BadAgent: Inserting and Activating Backdoor Attacks in LLM AgentsYifei Wang, Dizhan Xue, Shengjie Zhang, Shengsheng QianACL 2024
- Effective PII Extraction from LLMs through Augmented Few-Shot LearningShuai Cheng, Shu Meng, Haitao Xu, Haoran Zhang et al.USENIX Security 2025
