Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Latent Distribution Representation Learning
Da Wang, Lin Li, Wei Wei, Qixian Yu, Jianye Hao, Jiye Liang
Abstract
Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) commonly suffers from the out-of-distribution (OOD) overestimation issue due to the distribution shift. Prior work gradually shifts their focus from suppressing OOD overestimation to avoiding overly conservative learning from suboptimal behavior policies to improve generalization. However, most approaches explicitly delimit boundaries for OOD actions based on the support in the dataset, which can potentially impede the data near these boundaries from acquiring realistic estimates. This paper investigates how to loosen the rigid demarcation of OOD boundaries, adaptively extracting knowledge from empirical data to implicitly improve the model's generalization to nearby unseen data. We introduce an adversarial data splitting (ADS) framework that enforces the model to generalize the distribution shifts simulated from the train/validation subsets splitting of the dataset. Specifically, ADS is modeled as a min-max optimization problem inspired by metalearning and solved by iterating over the following two steps. First, we train the model on the train-subset to minimize its loss on the validationsubset. Then, we adversarially generate the "hardest" train/validation subsets with the maximum distribution shift, making the model incapable of generalization at that splitting. We derive a generalization error bound for theoretically understanding ADS and verify the effectiveness with extensive experiments. Code is available at https: //github.com/DkING-lv6/ADS .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b40e1af8-7467-4698-933a-7ed610db0ff3Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
- Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-EnsembleGaon An, Seungyong Moon, Jang-Hyun Kim, Hyun Oh SongNeurIPS 2021 · 430 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic RegularizationIlya Kostrikov, Rob Fergus, Jonathan Tompson, Ofir NachumICML 2021 · 350 citations
- Uncertainty Weighted Actor-Critic for Offline Reinforcement LearningYue Wu, Shuangfei Zhai, Nitish Srivastava, Joshua M. Susskind et al.ICML 2021 · 223 citations
Related papers
- Improving Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial Data SplittingDa Wang, Lin Li, Wei Wei, Qixian Yu et al.ICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning with Online Self-SupervisionVitchyr H. Pong, Ashvin Nair, Laura Smith, Catherine Huang et al.ICML 2022 · 78 citations
- RORL: Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning via Conservative SmoothingRui Yang, Chenjia Bai, Xiaoteng Ma, Zhaoran Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 118 citations
- Test-time Adapted Reinforcement Learning with Action Entropy RegularizationShoukai Xu, Zihao Lian, Mingkui Tan, Liu Liu et al.ICML 2025
