SCOUT: Active Information Foraging for Long-Text Understanding with Decoupled Epistemic States
Zhenliang Zhang, Wenqing Wang, Yong Hu, Yaming Yang, Jiaheng Gao, Chen Shen, Xiaojun Wan
Abstract
Long-Text Understanding (LTU) at million-token scale requires balancing reasoning fidelity with computational efficiency. Frontier long-context LLMs can process millions of token contexts end-to-end, but they suffer from high token consumption and attention dilution. In parallel, specialized LTU agents often sacrifice fidelity through task-agnostic abstractions like graph construction or indexing. We identify a key insight for LTU: query-relevant information is typically sparse relative to the full document, so effective reasoning should rely on a query-sufficient subset rather than the entire context. To address this, we propose SCOUT, a new paradigm for LTU that shifts from passive processing to active information foraging . It treats the document as an explorable environment and answers from a compact, provenance-grounded epistemic state. Guided by state-level gap diagnosis, SCOUT adaptively alternates between coarse-to-fine exploration and anchored state updates that progressively contract its epistemic state toward query sufficiency. Experiments show that SCOUT matches state-of-the-art proprietary models while reducing token consumption by up to 8 times. Moreover, SCOUT remains stable as context length scales, substantially alleviating the practical cost--capability trade-off in long-context reasoning. Resources are available at our Project Page .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b32b537a-da38-4718-9a72-4d8ae1bfba6dBuilds on9
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- MemAgent: Reshaping Long-Context LLM with Multi-Conv RL-based Memory AgentHongli Yu, Tinghong Chen, Jiangtao Feng, Jiangjie Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 231 citations
- A Human-Inspired Reading Agent with Gist Memory of Very Long ContextsKuang-Huei Lee, Xinyun Chen, Hiroki Furuta, John F. Canny et al.ICML 2024 · 106 citations
- LONGAGENT: Achieving Question Answering for 128k-Token-Long Documents through Multi-Agent CollaborationJun Zhao, Can Zu, Xu Hao, Yi Lu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Language-based Trial and Error Falls Behind in the Era of ExperienceHaoyu Wang, Guozheng Ma, Shugang Cui, Yilun Kong et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Let's (not) just put things in Context: Test-time Training for Long-context LLMsRachit Bansal, Aston Zhang, Rishabh Tiwari, Lovish Madaan et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- VideoARM: Agentic Reasoning over Hierarchical Memory for Long-Form Video UnderstandingYufei Yin, Qianke Meng, Minghao Chen, Jiajun Ding et al.CVPR 2026 · 24 citations
- Hunt Instead of Wait: Evaluating Deep Data Research on Large Language ModelsWei Liu, Peijie Yu, Michele Orini, Yali Du et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Knowing When to Stop: Efficient Context Processing via Latent Sufficiency SignalsRoy Xie, Junlin Wang, Paul Rosu, Chunyuan Deng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
