Understanding the Performance Costs and Benefits of Privacy-focused Browser Extensions
Kevin Borgolte, Nick Feamster
Abstract
Advertisements and behavioral tracking have become an invasive nuisance on the Internet in recent years. Indeed, privacy advocates and expert users consider the invasion significant enough to warrant the use of ad blockers and anti-tracking browser extensions. At the same time, one of the largest advertisement companies in the world, Google, is developing the most popular browser, Google Chrome. This conflict of interest, that is developing a browser (a user agent) and being financially motivated to track users’ online behavior, possibly violating their privacy expectations, while claiming to be a ”user agent,” did not remain unnoticed. As a matter of fact, Google recently sparked an outrage when proposing changes to Chrome how extensions can inspect and modify requests to ”improve extension performance and privacy,” which would render existing privacy-focused extensions inoperable. In this paper, we analyze how eight popular privacy-focused browser extensions for Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox, the two desktop browsers with the highest market share, affect browser performance. We measure browser performance through several metrics focused on user experience, such as page-load times, number of fetched resources, as well as response sizes. To address potential regional differences in advertisements or tracking, such as influenced by the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we perform our study from two vantage points, the United States of America and Germany. Moreover, we also analyze how these extensions affect system performance, in particular CPU time, which serves as a proxy indicator for battery runtime of mobile devices. Contrary to Google’s claims that extensions which inspect and block requests negatively affect browser performance, we find that a browser with privacy-focused request-modifying extensions performs similar or better on our metrics compared to a browser without extensions. In fact, even a combination of such extensions performs no worse than a browser without any extensions. Our results highlight that privacy-focused extensions not only improve users’ privacy, but can also increase users’ browsing experience.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- XHOUND: Quantifying the Fingerprintability of Browser ExtensionsOleksii Starov, Nick NikiforakisS&P 2017 · 104 citations
- Mystique: Uncovering Information Leakage from Browser ExtensionsQuan Chen, Alexandros KapravelosCCS 2018 · 88 citations
- Everyone is Different: Client-side Diversification for Defending Against Extension FingerprintingErik Trickel, Oleksii Starov, Alexandros Kapravelos, Nick Nikiforakis et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 43 citations
Related papers
- AdGraph: A Graph-Based Approach to Ad and Tracker BlockingUmar Iqbal, Peter Snyder, Shitong Zhu, Benjamin Livshits et al.S&P 2020 · 112 citations
- The First Early Evidence of the Use of Browser Fingerprinting for Online TrackingZengrui Liu, Jimmy Dani, Yinzhi Cao, Shujiang Wu et al.WWW 2025 · 7 citations
- Websites Need Your Permission Too - User Sentiment and Decision-Making on Web Permission Prompts in Desktop ChromeMarian HarbachCHI 2024 · 3 citations
- Privacy Settings and Ad Perception: The Shift from Third-Party Cookies to the Privacy SandboxAbir Benzaamia, Oana GogaCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Automating Cookie Consent and GDPR Violation DetectionDino Bollinger, Karel Kubicek, Carlos Cotrini, David A. BasinUSENIX Security 2022
