Pretrain Value, Not Reward: Decoupled Value Policy Optimization
Chenghua Huang, Lu Wang, Fangkai Yang, Pu Zhao, Qingwei Lin, Dongmei Zhang, Saravan Rajmohan
Abstract
In this paper, we explore how directly pretraining a value model simplifies and stabilizes reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). In reinforcement learning, value estimation is the key to policy optimization, distinct from reward supervision. The value function predicts the return-to-go of a partial answer, that is, how promising the partial answer is if it were continued to completion. In RLHF, however, the standard pipeline first pretrains a reward model and then learns a value function online, even though no new reward signals are available once preference data is collected. This makes critic learning redundant, as the process of training a reward model and then deriving a value model is informationally equivalent to directly pretraining a value model. Importantly, this requires no additional supervision, and our value model is trained on exactly the same data used for reward modeling. Building on this insight, we introduce Decoupled Value Policy Optimization (DVPO), a framework that pretrains a Global Value Model (GVM) offline and freezes it as a universal critic for policy learning. The GVM provides stable, fine-grained credit assignment without critic drift or trajectory sampling. Experiments across MT-Bench, Alpaca-Eval, and Arena-Hard demonstrate that DVPO matches or surpasses state-of-the-art RLHF methods. These results highlight RLHF can be reframed as policy-only optimization guided by a single pretrained value model. The implementation code for our method is available in https://github.com/microsoft/DKI_LLM/tree/main/dvpo
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b300892f-4e2e-40ab-843f-49ca8e28479bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFShicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai et al.ICLR 2025
- Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference ModelJunshu Pan, Wei Shen, Shulin Huang, Qiji Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 7 citations
- Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward InferenceQining Zhang, Lei YingICLR 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- PS-PPO : Prefix-Sampling PPO for Critic-Free RLHFDoo Hwan Hwang, Kee-Eung KimICML 2026
