Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference Model
Junshu Pan, Wei Shen, Shulin Huang, Qiji Zhou, Yue Zhang
Abstract
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for large language models (LLMs) by directly training on offline preference data to align with human preferences. During DPO training, the reference model serves as a data weight adjuster. However, the common practice of initializing the policy and reference models identically in DPO can lead to inefficient data utilization and impose a performance ceiling. Meanwhile, the absence of a reference model in Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO) reduces training robustness and requires stricter conditions to prevent catastrophic forgetting. In this work, we propose Pre-DPO, a simple yet effective DPO-based training paradigm that improves preference optimization by introducing a guiding reference model. This reference model provides foresight into the desired policy state achievable through the training preference data, serving as a guiding mechanism that adaptively assigns higher weights to samples more suitable for the model and lower weights to those less suitable. Extensive experiments on the AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard v0.1 benchmarks demonstrate that Pre-DPO consistently improves the performance of both DPO and SimPO, without relying on external models or additional data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f13d998e-cdb8-4963-ac92-943bf496862bCited by top-tier papers7
- Mathesis: Towards Formal Theorem Proving from Natural LanguagesXuejun Yu, Jianyuan Zhong, Zijin Feng, Pengyi Zhai et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- Uni-DPO: A Unified Paradigm for Dynamic Preference Optimization of LLMsShangpin Peng, Weinong Wang, Zhuotao Tian, Senqiao Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Multiplayer Nash Preference OptimizationFang Wu, Xu Huang, Weihao Xuan, Zhiwei Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Mitigating Mismatch within Reference-based Preference OptimizationSuqin Yuan, Xingrui Yu, Jiyang Zheng, Lei Feng et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Risk-aware Direct Preference Optimization under Nested Risk MeasureLijun Zhang, Lin Li, Yajie Qi, Huizhong Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
Related papers
- Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay PerspectiveRuichen Shao, Bei Li, Gangao Liu, Yang Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.ICML 2025
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFHan Zhong, Zikang Shan, Guhao Feng, Wei Xiong et al.ICML 2025
- WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference OptimizationWenxuan Zhou, Ravi Agrawal, Shujian Zhang, Sathish Reddy Indurthi et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
