Arithmetic Feature Interaction Is Necessary for Deep Tabular Learning
Yi Cheng, Renjun Hu, Haochao Ying, Xing Shi, Jian Wu, Wei Lin
Abstract
Until recently, the question of the effective inductive bias of deep models on tabular data has remained unanswered. This paper investigates the hypothesis that arithmetic feature interaction is necessary for deep tabular learning. To test this point, we create a synthetic tabular dataset with a mild feature interaction assumption and examine a modified transformer architecture enabling arithmetical feature interactions, referred to as AMFormer. Results show that AM-Former outperforms strong counterparts in fine-grained tabular data modeling, data efficiency in training, and generalization. This is attributed to its parallel additive and multiplicative attention operators and prompt-based optimization, which facilitate the separation of tabular samples in an extended space with arithmetically-engineered features. Our extensive experiments on real-world data also validate the consistent effectiveness, efficiency, and rationale of AMFormer, suggesting it has established a strong inductive bias for deep learning on tabular data. Code is available at https://github . com/aigc-apps/AMFormer.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b2dd023e-0911-47e7-b60c-48ccd3b39a2aCited by top-tier papers2
- pTNAS: Progressive Neural Architecture Search for Tabular DataNaili Xing, Shaofeng Cai, Lingze Zeng, Jiaqi Zhu et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
- Contrastive Symbolic Regression: Aligned Representations, Adaptive Prediction, and Diverse EnsemblesHengzhe Zhang, Qi Chen, Bing Xue, Wolfgang Banzhaf et al.ICML 2026
Builds on13
- Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataYury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem BabenkoNeurIPS 2021 · 1,847 citations
- Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural NetsRishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 663 citations
- Neural Oblivious Decision Ensembles for Deep Learning on Tabular DataSergei Popov, Stanislav Morozov, Artem BabenkoICLR 2020 · 407 citations
- Well-tuned Simple Nets Excel on Tabular DatasetsArlind Kadra, Marius Lindauer, Frank Hutter, Josif GrabockaNeurIPS 2021 · 288 citations
- White-Box Transformers via Sparse Rate ReductionYaodong Yu, Sam Buchanan, Druv Pai, Tianzhe Chu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 149 citations
Related papers
- T2G-FORMER: Organizing Tabular Features into Relation Graphs Promotes Heterogeneous Feature InteractionJiahuan Yan, Jintai Chen, Yixuan Wu, Danny Z. Chen et al.AAAI 2023 · 60 citations
- Can a Deep Learning Model be a Sure Bet for Tabular Prediction?Jintai Chen, Jiahuan Yan, Qiyuan Chen, Danny Z. Chen et al.KDD 2024 · 4 citations
- APAR: Modeling Irregular Target Functions in Tabular Regression via Arithmetic-Aware Pre-Training and Adaptive-Regularized Fine-TuningHong-Wei Wu, Wei-Yao Wang, Kuang-Da Wang, Wen-Chih PengAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular LearningSercan Ö. Arik, Tomas PfisterAAAI 2021 · 2,148 citations
- TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text EncodingJingfeng Yang, Aditya Gupta, Shyam Upadhyay, Luheng He et al.ACL 2022 · 145 citations
