Persona-Augmented Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs Across Diverse Writing Styles
Kimberly Le Truong, Riccardo Fogliato, Hoda Heidari, Steven Wu
Abstract
Current benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) often do not exhibit enough writing style diversity, with many adhering primarily to standardized conventions. Such benchmarks do not fully capture the rich variety of communication patterns exhibited by humans. Thus, it is possible that LLMs, which are optimized on these benchmarks, may demonstrate brittle performance when faced with "non-standard" input. In this work, we test this hypothesis by rewriting evaluation prompts using persona-based LLM prompting, a lowcost method to emulate diverse writing styles. Our results show that, even with identical semantic content, variations in writing style and prompt formatting significantly impact the estimated performance of the LLM under evaluation. Notably, we identify distinct writing styles that consistently trigger either low or high performance across a range of models and tasks, irrespective of model family, size, and recency. Our work offers a scalable approach to augment existing benchmarks, improving the external validity of the assessments they provide for measuring LLM performance across linguistic variations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b29377b0-c79a-4b5e-a255-3cd9d99b8c65Cited by top-tier papers3
- Lost in Simulation: LLM-Simulated Users are Unreliable Proxies for Human Users in Agentic EvaluationsPreethi Seshadri, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Ayomide Odumakinde, Sameer Singh et al.ACL 2026 · 19 citations
- One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM PersonalizationFranziska Weeber, Vera Neplenbroek, Jan Batzner, Sebastian PadóACL 2026 · 4 citations
- AwarenessBench: Assessing Cognitive Capabilities of Language ModelsXiaojian Li, Rongwu Xu, Tianyun Zhang, Yue Wang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on7
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMsFelipe Maia Polo, Ronald Xu, Lucas Weber, Mírian Silva et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 93 citations
- Simulacrum of Stories: Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research ParticipantsShivani Kapania, William Agnew, Motahhare Eslami, Hoda Heidari et al.CHI 2025 · 59 citations
- Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckListMarco Túlio Ribeiro, Tongshuang Wu, Carlos Guestrin, Sameer SinghACL 2020 · 51 citations
Related papers
- An Empirical Analysis of the Writing Styles of Persona-Assigned LLMsManuj Malik, Jing Jiang, Kian Ming A. ChaiEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Examining the robustness of LLM evaluation to the distributional assumptions of benchmarksCharlotte Siska, Katerina Marazopoulou, Melissa Ailem, James BonoACL 2024
- PersonalLLM: Tailoring LLMs to Individual PreferencesThomas P. Zollo, Andrew Wei Tung Siah, Naimeng Ye, Ang Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Can You Make It Sound Like You? Post-Editing LLM-Generated Text for Personal StyleConnor Baumler, Calvin Bao, Huy Nghiem, Xinchen Yang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Measuring Intent Comprehension in LLMsNadav Kunievsky, James EvansICML 2026 · 1 citation
