EMMA: Concept Erasure Benchmark with Comprehensive Semantic Metrics and Diverse Categories
Lu Wei, Yuta Nakashima, Noa Garcia
Abstract
The widespread adoption of text-to-image (T2I) generation has raised concerns about privacy, bias, and copyright violations. Concept erasure techniques offer a promising solution by selectively removing undesired concepts from pre-trained models without requiring full retraining. However, these methods are often evaluated on a limited set of concepts, relying on overly simplistic and direct prompts. To test the boundaries of concept erasure techniques, and assess whether they truly remove targeted concepts from model representations, we introduce EMMA, a benchmark that evaluates five key dimensions of concept erasure over 13 metrics. EMMA goes beyond standard metrics like image quality and time efficiency, testing robustness under challenging conditions, including indirect descriptions, visually similar non-target concepts, and potential gender and ethnicity bias, providing a socially aware analysis of method behavior. Using EMMA, we analyze five concept erasure methods across five domains (objects, celebrities, art styles, NSFW, and copyright). Our results show that existing methods struggle with implicit prompts (i.e., generating the erased concept when it is indirectly referenced) and visually similar non-target concepts (i.e., failing to generate non-target concepts resembling the erased one), while some amplify gender and ethnicity bias compared to the original model. Code and prompts are available at https://github.com/lobsterlulu/EMMA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b2904f87-f9de-4a67-8b2c-45cb8e3f7191Builds on23
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
- Zero-Shot Text-to-Image GenerationAditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray et al.ICML 2021 · 6,356 citations
- Erasing Concepts from Diffusion ModelsRohit Gandikota, Joanna Materzynska, Jaden Fiotto-Kaufman, David BauICCV 2023 · 536 citations
Related papers
- Prototype-Guided Concept Erasure in Diffusion ModelsYuze Cai, Jiahao Lu, Hongxiang Shi, Yichao Zhou et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- Beyond Text Prompts: Precise Concept Erasure through Text-Image CollaborationJun Li, Lizhi Xiong, Ziqiang Li, Weiwei Jiang et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Erasing More Than Intended? How Concept Erasure Degrades the Generation of Non-Target ConceptsIbtihel Amara, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Ivana Kajic, Zarana Parekh et al.ICCV 2025 · 14 citations
- Circumventing Concept Erasure Methods For Text-To-Image Generative ModelsMinh Pham, Kelly O. Marshall, Niv Cohen, Govind Mittal et al.ICLR 2024 · 82 citations
- Holistic Unlearning Benchmark: A Multi-Faceted Evaluation for Text-to-Image Diffusion Model UnlearningSaemi Moon, Minjong Lee, Sangdon Park, Dongwoo KimICCV 2025
