Lune

EMNLP Findings2022

Improving the Sample Efficiency of Prompt Tuning with Domain Adaptation

Xu Guo, Boyang Li, Han Yu

Abstract

Prompt tuning, or the conditioning of a frozen pretrained language model (PLM) with soft prompts learned from data, has demonstrated impressive performance on a wide range of NLP tasks. However, prompt tuning requires a large training dataset to be effective and is outperformed by finetuning the entire PLM in data-scarce regimes. Previous work (Gu et al., 2022;Vu et al., 2022) proposed to transfer soft prompts pretrained on the source domain to the target domain. In this paper, we explore domain adaptation for prompt tuning, a problem setting where unlabeled data from the target domain are available during pretraining. We propose bOosting Prompt TunIng with doMain Adaptation (OPTIMA), which regularizes the decision boundary to be smooth around regions where source and target data distributions are similar. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OPTIMA significantly enhances the transferability and sample-efficiency of prompt tuning compared to strong baselines. Moreover, in few-shot settings, OPTIMA exceeds full-model tuning by a large margin.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 6 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers6

  1. Concentrate Attention: Towards Domain-Generalizable Prompt Optimization for Language ModelsChengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Yichen Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
  2. Robust Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models Against Distribution ShiftsMoxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Yixin Cao et al.EMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
  3. From Weights to Activations: Is Steering the Next Frontier of Adaptation?Simon Ostermann, Daniil Gurgurov, Tanja Baeumel, Michael A. Hedderich et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
  4. PACT: Phase-Like Transition Constraints in Adapter-Based Continual Learning of Vision-Language ModelsXuan Wang, Guiguang Ding, Jungong HanCVPR 2026
  5. Release the Powers of Prompt Tuning: Cross-Modality Prompt TransferNingyuan Zhang, Jie Lu, Keqiuyin Li, Zhen Fang et al.ICLR 2025

Builds on22

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  3. Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency TrainingQizhe Xie, Zihang Dai, Eduard H. Hovy, Thang Luong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,774 citations
  4. Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer LearningJunxian He, Chunting Zhou, Xuezhe Ma, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,182 citations
  5. Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter LayersRabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, James Henderson, Sebastian RuderNeurIPS 2021 · 700 citations

Related papers

  1. The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt TuningBrian Lester, Rami Al-Rfou, Noah ConstantEMNLP 2021 · 94 citations
  2. Gradient-Regulated Meta-Prompt Learning for Generalizable Vision-Language ModelsJuncheng Li, Minghe Gao, Longhui Wei, Siliang Tang et al.ICCV 2023 · 34 citations
  3. PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot LearningYuxian Gu, Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, Minlie HuangACL 2022
  4. Model ensemble instead of prompt fusion: a sample-specific knowledge transfer method for few-shot prompt tuningXiangyu Peng, Chen Xing, Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Chien-Sheng Wu et al.ICLR 2023 · 5 citations
  5. Self-supervised Meta-Prompt Learning with Meta-Gradient Regularization for Few-shot GeneralizationKaihang Pan, Juncheng Li, Hongye Song, Jun Lin et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 4 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines