Court of LLMs: Evidence-Augmented Generation via Multi-LLM Collaboration for Text-Attributed Graph Anomaly Detection
Yiming Xu, Jiarun Chen, Zhen Peng, Zihan Chen, Qika Lin, Lan Ma, Bin Shi, Bo Dong
Abstract
The natural combination of intricate topological structures and rich textual information in text-attributed graphs (TAGs) opens up a novel perspective for graph anomaly detection (GAD). However, existing GAD methods primarily focus on designing complex optimization objectives within the graph domain, overlooking the complementary value of the textual modality, whose features are often encoded by shallow embedding techniques, such as bag-of-words or skip-gram, so that semantic context related to anomalies may be missed. To unleash the enormous potential of textual modality, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising alternatives due to their strong semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities. Nevertheless, their application to TAG anomaly detection remains nascent, and they struggle to encode high-order structural information inherent in graphs due to input length constraints. For high-quality anomaly detection in TAGs, we propose CoLL, a novel framework that combines LLMs and graph neural networks (GNNs) to leverage their complementary strengths. CoLL employs multi-LLM collaboration for evidence-augmented generation to capture anomaly-relevant contexts while delivering human-readable rationales for detected anomalies. Moreover, CoLL integrates a GNN equipped with a gating mechanism to adaptively fuse textual features with evidence while preserving high-order topological information. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of CoLL, achieving an average improvement of 13.37% in AP. This study opens a new avenue for incorporating LLMs in advancing GAD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b1f3f9ae-2060-4ced-b35a-10cf8988dce0Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on19
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on GraphsKaveh Hassani, Amir Hosein Khas AhmadiICML 2020 · 1,663 citations
- One For All: Towards Training One Graph Model For All Classification TasksHao Liu, Jiarui Feng, Lecheng Kong, Ningyue Liang et al.ICLR 2024 · 253 citations
- Node Feature Extraction by Self-Supervised Multi-scale Neighborhood PredictionEli Chien, Wei-Cheng Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Hsiang-Fu Yu et al.ICLR 2022 · 185 citations
- GraphGPT: Graph Instruction Tuning for Large Language ModelsJiabin Tang, Yuhao Yang, Wei Wei, Lei Shi et al.SIGIR 2024 · 182 citations
Related papers
- GraphTextack: A Realistic Black-Box Node Injection Attack on LLM-Enhanced GNNsJiaji Ma, Puja Trivedi, Danai KoutraAAAI 2026
- GuARD: Effective Anomaly Detection through a Text-Rich and Graph-Informed Language ModelYunhe Pang, Bo Chen, Fanjin Zhang, Yanghui Rao et al.KDD 2025
- Both Topology and Text Matter: Revisiting LLM-guided Out-of-Distribution Detection on Text-attributed GraphsYinlin Zhu, Di Wu, Xu Wang, Guocong Quan et al.KDD 2026
- Compressing LLM Knowledge into Graph Representations for Text-attributed Graphs LearningRunhuai Chen, Dian Shen, Dandan Zhang, Kaihong Huang et al.ACL 2026
- Can LLMs Find Fraudsters? Multi-level LLM Enhanced Graph Fraud DetectionTairan Huang, Yili Wang, Qiutong Li, Changlong He et al.ACM MM 2025 · 10 citations
