GraphTextack: A Realistic Black-Box Node Injection Attack on LLM-Enhanced GNNs
Jiaji Ma, Puja Trivedi, Danai Koutra
Abstract
Text-attributed graphs (TAGs), which combine structural and textual node information, are ubiquitous across many domains. Recent work integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to jointly model semantics and structure, resulting in more general and expressive models that achieve state-of-the-art performance on TAG benchmarks. However, this integration introduces dual vulnerabilities: GNNs are sensitive to structural perturbations, while LLM-derived features are vulnerable to prompt injection and adversarial phrasing. While existing adversarial attacks largely perturb structure or text independently, we find that uni-modal attacks cause only modest degradation in LLM-enhanced GNNs. Moreover, many existing attacks assume unrealistic capabilities, such as white-box access or direct modification of graph data. To address these gaps, we propose GRAPHTEXTACK, the first black-box, multi-modal, poisoning node injection attack for LLM-enhanced GNNs. GRAPHTEXTACK injects nodes with carefully crafted structure and semantics to degrade model performance, operating under a realistic threat model without relying on model internals or surrogate models. To navigate the combinatorial, nondifferentiable search space of connectivity and feature assignments, GRAPHTEXTACK introduces a novel evolutionary optimization framework with a multi-objective fitness function that balances local prediction disruption and global graph influence. Extensive experiments on five datasets and two stateof-the-art LLM-enhanced GNN models show that GRAPH-TEXTACK significantly outperforms 12 strong baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8cc4274b-3668-4fad-b8ee-d9f7d8c0426bCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingMelanie Sclar, Yejin Choi, Yulia Tsvetkov, Alane SuhrICLR 2024 · 682 citations
- BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTLinyang Li, Ruotian Ma, Qipeng Guo, Xiangyang Xue et al.EMNLP 2020 · 529 citations
- One For All: Towards Training One Graph Model For All Classification TasksHao Liu, Jiarui Feng, Lecheng Kong, Ningyue Liang et al.ICLR 2024 · 253 citations
- Talk like a Graph: Encoding Graphs for Large Language ModelsBahare Fatemi, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan PerozziICLR 2024 · 194 citations
Related papers
- Can LLMs Fool Graph Learning? Exploring Universal Adversarial Attacks on Text-Attributed GraphsZihui Chen, Yuling Wang, Pengfei Jiao, Kai Wu et al.WWW 2026
- Unveiling the Vulnerability of Graph-LLMs: An Interpretable Multi-Dimensional Adversarial Attack on TAGsBowen Fan, Zhilin Guo, Xunkai Li, Yihan Zhou et al.WWW 2026
- Are LLM-Enhanced Graph Neural Networks Robust Against Poisoning Attacks?Yuhang Ma, Jie Wang, Zheng YanS&P 2026 · 4 citations
- Robustness in Text-Attributed Graph Learning: Insights, Trade-offs, and New DefensesRunlin Lei, Lu Yi, Mingguo He, Pengyu Qiu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Towards Robust Text-Attributed Federated Graph Learning: Multimodal Threats and DefenseZitong Shi, Guancheng Wan, Wenke Huang, Yuxin Wu et al.AAAI 2026
