Lune

ACL Findings2026

CE-RM: A Pointwise Generative Reward Model Optimized via Two-Stage Rollout and Unified Criteria

Xinyu Hu, Yancheng He, Weixun Wang, Tao Feng, Li Lin, Jiashun Liu, Wenbo Su, Bo Zheng, Xiaojun Wan

Abstract

Automatic evaluation is crucial yet challenging for open-ended natural language generation, especially when rule-based metrics are infeasible. Compared with traditional methods, the recent LLM-as-a-Judge paradigms enable better and more flexible evaluation, and show promise as generative reward models for reinforcement learning. However, prior work has revealed a notable gap between their seemingly impressive benchmark performance and actual effectiveness in RL practice. We attribute this issue to some limitations in existing studies, including the dominance of pairwise evaluation and inadequate optimization of evaluation criteria. Therefore, we propose CE-RM-4B, a pointwise generative reward model trained with a dedicated two-stage rollout method, and adopting unified query-based criteria. Using only about 5.7K high-quality data curated from the open-source preference dataset, our CE-RM-4B achieves superior performance on diverse reward model benchmarks, especially in Bestof-N scenarios, and delivers more effective improvements in downstream RL practice.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on17

  1. Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
  2. Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
  3. BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
  4. RM-R1: Reward Modeling as ReasoningXiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin et al.ICLR 2026 · 147 citations
  5. RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model EvaluationSaumya Malik, Valentina Pyatkin, Sander Land, Jacob Morrison et al.ICLR 2026 · 139 citations

Related papers

  1. UniRRM: Unified Reasoning Reward Models Across Languages and Evaluation ParadigmsPeng Lai, Yichao Du, Junchao Wu, Weibo Gao et al.ICML 2026
  2. OpenGenAlign: A Preference Dataset and Benchmark for Trustworthy Reward Modeling in Open-Ended, Long-Context GenerationHanning Zhang, Juntong Song, Juno Zhu, Yuanhao Wu et al.ACL Findings 2026 · 2 citations
  3. ToolRM: Towards Agentic Tool-Use Reward ModelingRenhao Li, Jianhong Tu, Yang Su, Yantao Liu et al.ACL Findings 2026
  4. Think-J: Learning to Think for Generative LLM-as-a-JudgeHui Huang, Yancheng He, Hongli Zhou, Rui Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 12 citations
  5. From General Reward to Targeted Reward: Improving Open-ended Long-context Generation ModelsZhihan Guo, Jiele Wu, Wenqian Cui, Yifei Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines