Caveat (IoT) Emptor: Towards Transparency of IoT Device Presence
Sashidhar Jakkamsetti, Youngil Kim, Gene Tsudik
Abstract
As many types of IoT devices worm their way into numerous settings and many aspects of our daily lives, awareness of their presence and functionality becomes a source of major concern. Hidden IoT devices can snoop (via sensing) on nearby unsuspecting users, and impact the environment where unaware users are present, via actuation. This prompts, respectively, privacy and security/safety issues. The dangers of hidden IoT devices have been recognized and prior research suggested some means of mitigation, mostly based on traffic analysis or using specialized hardware to uncover devices. While such approaches are partially effective, there is currently no comprehensive approach to IoT device transparency. Prompted in part by recent privacy regulations (GDPR and CCPA), this paper motivates and constructs a privacy-agile Rootof-Trust architecture for IoT devices, called PAISA: Privacy-agile IoT Sensing and Actuation. It guarantees timely and secure announcements about IoT devices' presence and their capabilities. PAISA has two components: one on the IoT device that guarantees periodic announcements of its presence even if all device software is compromised, and the other that runs on the user device, which captures and processes announcements. Notably, PAISA requires no hardware modifications; it uses a popular off-the-shelf Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) -ARM TrustZone. This work also comprises a fully functional (open-sourced) prototype implementation of PAISA, which includes: an IoT device that makes announcements via IEEE 802.11 WiFi beacons and an Android smartphone-based app that captures and processes announcements. Both security and performance of PAISA design and prototype are discussed. * 'Caveat Emptor" is Latin for "User Beware".
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b0f9f6cd-47d6-4a9b-ad2d-6f6c5fb8da36Builds on24
- Sanctum: Minimal Hardware Extensions for Strong Software IsolationVictor Costan, Ilia A. Lebedev, Srinivas DevadasUSENIX Security 2016 · 649 citations
- (Un)informed Consent: Studying GDPR Consent Notices in the FieldChristine Utz, Martin Degeling, Sascha Fahl, Florian Schaub et al.CCS 2019 · 429 citations
- Keystone: an open framework for architecting trusted execution environmentsDayeol Lee, David Kohlbrenner, Shweta Shinde, Krste Asanovic et al.EuroSys 2020 · 381 citations
- PIR with Compressed Queries and Amortized Query ProcessingSebastian Angel, Hao Chen, Kim Laine, Srinath T. V. SettyS&P 2018 · 353 citations
- C-FLAT: Control-Flow Attestation for Embedded Systems SoftwareTigist Abera, N. Asokan, Lucas Davi, Jan-Erik Ekberg et al.CCS 2016 · 311 citations
Related papers
- Privacy-from-Birth: Protecting Sensed Data from Malicious Sensors with VERSAIvan De Oliveira Nunes, Seoyeon Hwang, Sashidhar Jakkamsetti, Gene TsudikS&P 2022 · 11 citations
- GAROTA: Generalized Active Root-Of-Trust Architecture (for Tiny Embedded Devices)Esmerald Aliaj, Ivan De Oliveira Nunes, Gene TsudikUSENIX Security 2022
- APEX: A Verified Architecture for Proofs of Execution on Remote Devices under Full Software CompromiseIvan De Oliveira Nunes, Karim Eldefrawy, Norrathep Rattanavipanon, Gene TsudikUSENIX Security 2020
- PARTEMU: Enabling Dynamic Analysis of Real-World TrustZone Software Using EmulationLee Harrison, Hayawardh Vijayakumar, Rohan Padhye, Koushik Sen et al.USENIX Security 2020
- PISTIS: Trusted Computing Architecture for Low-end Embedded SystemsMichele Grisafi, Mahmoud Ammar, Marco Roveri, Bruno CrispoUSENIX Security 2022
