EmoAgent: Assessing and Safeguarding Human-AI Interaction for Mental Health Safety
Jiahao Qiu, Yinghui He, Xinzhe Juan, Yimin Wang, Yuhan Liu, Zixin Yao, Yue Wu, Xun Jiang, Ling Yang, Mengdi Wang
Abstract
The rise of LLM-driven AI characters raises safety concerns, particularly for vulnerable human users with psychological disorders. To address these risks, we propose EmoAgent, a multi-agent AI framework designed to evaluate and mitigate mental health hazards in human-AI interactions. EmoAgent comprises two components: EmoEval simulates virtual users, including those portraying mentally vulnerable individuals, to assess mental health changes before and after interactions with AI characters. It uses clinically proven psychological and psychiatric assessment tools (PHQ-9, PDI, PANSS) to evaluate mental risks induced by LLM. EmoGuard serves as an intermediary, monitoring users' mental status, predicting potential harm, and providing corrective feedback to mitigate risks. Experiments conducted in popular character-based chatbots show that emotionally engaging dialogues can lead to psychological deterioration in vulnerable users, with mental state deterioration in more than 34.4% of the simulations. EmoGuard significantly reduces these deterioration rates, underscoring its role in ensuring safer AI-human interactions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- ReasonFlux-PRM: Trajectory-Aware PRMs for Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMsJiaru Zou, Ling Yang, Jingwen Gu, Jiahao Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 51 citations
- Benchmarking and Understanding Safety Risks in AI Character PlatformsYiluo Wei, Peixian Zhang, Gareth TysonNDSS 2026 · 4 citations
- Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental HealthHiba Arnaout, Anmol Goel, H. Andrew Schwartz, Steffen Eberhardt et al.ACL 2026
- MERMAID: Multi-perspective Self-reflective Agents with Generative Augmentation for Emotion RecognitionZhongyu Yang, Junhao Song, Siyang Song, Wei Pang et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on5
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing SystemsJoon Sung Park, Lindsay Popowski, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2022 · 192 citations
- Roleplay-doh: Enabling Domain-Experts to Create LLM-simulated Patients via Eliciting and Adhering to PrinciplesRyan Louie, Ananjan Nandi, William Fang, Cheng Chang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 37 citations
- An "Integrative Survey on Mental Health Conversational Agents to Bridge Computer Science and Medical Perspectives"Young Min Cho, Sunny Rai, Lyle H. Ungar, João Sedoc et al.EMNLP 2023 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Persona-Grounded Safety Evaluation of AI Companions in Multi-Turn ConversationsPrerna Juneja, Lika LomidzeACL 2026
- Exploring User Security and Privacy Attitudes and Concerns Toward the Use of General-Purpose LLM Chatbots for Mental HealthJabari Kwesi, Jiaxun Cao, Riya Manchanda, Pardis Emami NaeiniUSENIX Security 2025
- Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Examining LLMs for Multi-Turn Mental Health ConversationsMohit Chandra, Siddharth Sriraman, Harneet Singh Khanuja, Yiqiao Jin et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
- The Emotional Baby Is Truly Deadly: Does Your Multimodal Large Reasoning Model Have Emotional Flattery Towards Humans?Yuan Xun, Xiaojun Jia, Xinwei Liu, Simeng Qin et al.AAAI 2026
- PsychoGAT: A Novel Psychological Measurement Paradigm through Interactive Fiction Games with LLM AgentsQisen Yang, Zekun Wang, Honghui Chen, Shenzhi Wang et al.ACL 2024
