Understanding Individual Agent Importance in Multi-Agent System via Counterfactual Reasoning
Jianming Chen, Yawen Wang, Junjie Wang, Xiaofei Xie, Jun Hu, Qing Wang, Fanjiang Xu
Abstract
Explaining multi-agent systems (MAS) is urgent as these systems become increasingly prevalent in various applications. Previous work has provided explanations for the actions or states of agents, yet falls short in understanding the blackboxed agent’s importance within a MAS and the overall team strategy. To bridge this gap, we propose EMAI, a novel agent-level explanation approach that evaluates the individual agent’s importance. Inspired by counterfactual reasoning, a larger change in reward caused by the randomized action of agent indicates its higher importance. We model it as a MARL problem to capture interactions across agents. Utilizing counterfactual reasoning, EMAI learns the masking agents to identify important agents. Specifically, we define the optimization function to minimize the reward difference before and after action randomization and introduce sparsity constraints to encourage the exploration of more action randomization of agents during training. The experimental results in seven multi-agent tasks demonstrate that EMAI achieves higher fidelity in explanations compared to baselines and provides more effective guidance in practical applications concerning understanding policies, launching attacks, and patching policies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext afcf95fd-9760-4957-9aaa-7454c80c76ecCited by top-tier papers2
- Explaining Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning PoliciesKayla Boggess, Sarit Kraus, Lu FengAAAI 2026
- DEFT: Demystifying VLN Failures via a Unified Dual-View Explainability Framework for LLM-based AgentsYawen Wang, Yihan Dai, Jianming Chen, Junjie Wang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on18
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Google Research Football: A Novel Reinforcement Learning EnvironmentKarol Kurach, Anton Raichuk, Piotr Stanczyk, Michal Zajac et al.AAAI 2020 · 496 citations
- Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measuresI. Elizabeth Kumar, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Carlos Scheidegger, Sorelle A. FriedlerICML 2020 · 458 citations
- Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal AdversaryHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Duane S. Boning, Cho-Jui HsiehICLR 2021 · 212 citations
- Shapley Q-Value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward GamesJianhong Wang, Yuan Zhang, Tae-Kyun Kim, Yunjie GuAAAI 2020 · 159 citations
Related papers
- StateMask: Explaining Deep Reinforcement Learning through State MaskZelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Jiahao Yu, Wenhai Sun et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- TMAE: Learning Targeted Multi-Agent Exploration via Causal InferenceChuxiong Sun, Dunqi Yao, Rui Wang, Wenwen Qiang et al.AAAI 2026
- Counterfactual Effect Decomposition in Multi-Agent Sequential Decision MakingStelios Triantafyllou, Aleksa Sukovic, Yasaman Zolfimoselo, Goran RadanovicICML 2025
- Exploratory Not Explanatory: Counterfactual Analysis of Saliency Maps for Deep Reinforcement LearningAkanksha Atrey, Kaleigh Clary, David D. JensenICLR 2020 · 108 citations
- Enhancing Chemical Explainability Through Counterfactual MaskingLukasz Janisiów, Marek Kochanczyk, Bartosz Michal Zielinski, Tomasz DanelAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
