Dequantizing the Quantum singular value transformation: hardness and applications to Quantum chemistry and the Quantum PCP conjecture
Sevag Gharibian, François Le Gall
Abstract
The Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT) is a recent technique that gives a unified framework to describe most quantum algorithms discovered so far, and may lead to the development of novel quantum algorithms. In this paper we investigate the hardness of classically simulating the QSVT. A recent result by Chia, Gilyén, Li, Lin, Tang and Wang (STOC 2020) showed that the QSVT can be efficiently “dequantized” for low-rank matrices, and discussed its implication to quantum machine learning. In this work, motivated by establishing the superiority of quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and making progress on the quantum PCP conjecture, we focus on the other main class of matrices considered in applications of the QSVT, sparse matrices. We first show how to efficiently “dequantize”, with arbitrarily small constant precision, the QSVT associated with a low-degree polynomial. We apply this technique to design classical algorithms that estimate, with constant precision, the singular values of a sparse matrix. We show in particular that a central computational problem considered by quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry (estimating the ground state energy of a local Hamiltonian when given, as an additional input, a state sufficiently close to the ground state) can be solved efficiently with constant precision on a classical computer. As a complementary result, we prove that with inverse-polynomial precision, the same problem becomes BQP-complete. This gives theoretical evidence for the superiority of quantum algorithms for chemistry, and strongly suggests that said superiority stems from the improved precision achievable in the quantum setting. We also discuss how this dequantization technique may help make progress on the central quantum PCP conjecture.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af937323-d5c0-4662-882a-81aa435b9debCited by top-tier papers6
- Quantum Speedups for Zero-Sum Games via Improved Dynamic Gibbs SamplingAdam Bouland, Yosheb M. Getachew, Yujia Jin, Aaron Sidford et al.ICML 2023 · 18 citations
- An Improved Classical Singular Value Transformation for Quantum Machine LearningAinesh Bakshi, Ewin TangSODA 2024 · 13 citations
- Local Minima in Quantum SystemsChi-Fang Chen, Hsin-Yuan Huang, John Preskill, Leo ZhouSTOC 2024 · 12 citations
- Accelerating Inference for Multilayer Neural Networks with Quantum ComputersArthur G. Rattew, Po-Wei Huang, Naixu Guo, Lirandë Pira et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Quartic quantum speedups for planted inferenceAlexander Schmidhuber, Ryan O'Donnell, Robin Kothari, Ryan BabbushSODA 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Sampling-based sublinear low-rank matrix arithmetic framework for dequantizing quantum machine learningNai-Hui Chia, András Gilyén, Tongyang Li, Han-Hsuan Lin et al.STOC 2020 · 105 citations
- Quantum Eigenvalue ProcessingGuang Hao Low, Yuan SuFOCS 2024 · 12 citations
- Quantum and Classical Query Complexities of Functions of MatricesAshley Montanaro, Changpeng ShaoSTOC 2024 · 6 citations
- On Estimating the Trace of Quantum State PowersYupan Liu, Qisheng WangSODA 2025 · 3 citations
- TITAN: A Trajectory-Informed Technique for Adaptive Parameter Freezing in Large-Scale VQEYifeng Peng, Xinyi Li, Samuel Yen-Chi Chen, Kaining Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
