SMAP: Semantic Route Planning with Map-Grounded Multimodal Alignment
Wenjie Zhang, Chen Yang, Xin Lu, Zhen Wang, Yue Liu, Bobo Xi, Pengbo Zhang
Abstract
Semantic route planning involves generating itineraries that align with user intent while respecting real-world spatial constraints. However, text-only large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate geographically implausible routes due to poor spatial grounding. Inspired by how humans use maps for route planning, we propose the SMAP, which is the first multimodal framework combining user queries, POI metadata, and map tiles to produce spatially coherent, preference-aware routes. To enhance the spatial consistency, the SMAP features a two-stage antihallucination mechanism: (1) a map-grounded self-editing pipeline where a multimodal LLM (MLLM) drafts routes and a second MLLM verifies and refines them using geographic evidence; and (2) hallucination-penalized Direct Preference Optimization (HDPO) that steers the route generator toward spatially plausible routes by using verified routes as accepted responses and hallucinated drafts as rejected ones. Additionally, we introduce MM-Route, the first multimodal dataset for semantic route planning, with 3,000 diverse queries annotated with POI metadata and map tiles, covering a broad spectrum of geographic granularities and user intents. Experimental results demonstrate that SMAP significantly reduces geographical hallucinations and outperforms strong baselines in spatial plausibility and user alignment. Our project is at https://amap-mobility-intelligence.github.io/SMAP/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on16
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models - A Critical InvestigationKarthik Valmeekam, Matthew Marquez, Sarath Sreedharan, Subbarao KambhampatiNeurIPS 2023 · 509 citations
Related papers
- Mitigating Visual Hallucinations via Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization in MLLMsYuanshuai Li, Yuping Yan, Junfeng Tang, Zeqi Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- ReasonMap: Towards Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning from Transit MapsSicheng Feng, Song Wang, Shuyi Ouyang, Lingdong Kong et al.CVPR 2026 · 19 citations
- CHiP: Cross-modal Hierarchical Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal LLMsJinlan Fu, Shenzhen Huangfu, Hao Fei, Xiaoyu Shen et al.ICLR 2025
- VG-TVP: Multimodal Procedural Planning via Visually Grounded Text-Video PromptingMuhammet Furkan Ilaslan, Ali Köksal, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Burak Satar et al.AAAI 2025 · 3 citations
- RewardMap: Tackling Sparse Rewards in Fine-grained Visual Reasoning via Multi-Stage Reinforcement LearningSicheng Feng, Kaiwen Tuo, Song Wang, Lingdong Kong et al.ICLR 2026 · 28 citations
