Mitigating Visual Hallucinations via Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization in MLLMs
Yuanshuai Li, Yuping Yan, Junfeng Tang, Zeqi Zheng, Yaochu Jin
Abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly improved the performance of various tasks, but continue to suffer from visual hallucinations, a critical issue where generated responses contradict visual evidence. While Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is widely used for alignment, its application to MLLMs often fails to capture fine-grained semantic differences and encourages shortcut learning. To address these challenges, we propose Semantic Curriculum Preference Optimization (SCPO), a novel framework for MLLM alignment. SCPO employs a progressive, easy-to-hard curriculum built upon our Semantic Curriculum Preference Pairs dataset, which provides fine-grained semantic contrasts sorted by difficulty. This curriculum is trained with a dynamic reference model and a novel symmetric, bidirectional objective to facilitate simultaneous learning from both textual and visual preferences. To our knowledge, SCPO is the first framework to unify semantics, symmetry, and curriculum for MLLM alignment, effectively mitigating visual hallucinations. Extensive experiments on LLaVA models across various scales and versions validate that SCPO demonstrates superior performance compared to baseline models on multiple hallucination benchmarks, reducing the hallucination rate by up to 62.9%. Moreover, evaluations on generalized benchmarks show that SCPO improves factuality while preserving general capabilities, with its performance remaining stable across general vision-language benchmarks. Code is available here.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 00f6e20a-a5e3-4051-ae37-6ffa1ae8a4f5Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
Related papers
- CHiP: Cross-modal Hierarchical Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal LLMsJinlan Fu, Shenzhen Huangfu, Hao Fei, Xiaoyu Shen et al.ICLR 2025
- Mitigating Hallucination Through Theory-Consistent Symmetric Multimodal Preference OptimizationWenqi Liu, Xuemeng Song, Jiaxi Li, Yinwei Wei et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language ModelsFei Wang, Wenxuan Zhou, James Y. Huang, Nan Xu et al.EMNLP 2024 · 11 citations
- Cat-PO: Cross-modal Adaptive Token-rewards for Preference Optimization in Truthful Multimodal LLMsZhixiao Zheng, Zheren Fu, Zhiyuan Yao, Dongming Zhang et al.ICLR 2026
- Zooming from Context to Cue: Hierarchical Preference Optimization for Multi-Image MLLMsXudong Li, Mengdan Zhang, Peixian Chen, Xiawu Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
