HEV Generative Sandbox: A Framework for Assessing Domain-Specific Social Risks Through Human-LLM Simulation
Yiran Liu, Zhiyi Hou, Xiaoang Xu, Shuo Wang, Huijia Wu, Kaicheng Yu, Yang Yu, ChengXiang Zhai
Abstract
Deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) in specialized domains introduces significant societal and compliance risks, including bias amplification, misinformation propagation, and privacy violations. These risks predominantly emerge from the dynamic interactions between LLMs and humans in specific contexts. Different domains face unique distribution of hazards, and varying interaction modalities introduce distinct levels of exposure and vulnerability. However, current risk assessment frameworks lack a systematic methodology to capture this dynamic interplay. In this work, we introduce the HEV Generative Sandbox, a novel risk evaluation framework that simulates human-LLM behavior to quantify domain-contextual risks across three interdependent dimensions: 1) Hazard (H): Domain-specific threats inherent to a given context; 2) Exposure (E): The extent to which the LLM and its users are subjected to hazardous scenarios; 3) Vulnerability (V): The susceptibility of the system to risk due to human interaction or model weaknesses. Our approach pioneers "domain-rooted scenario generation", wherein we sample contextual distributions from domain-specific corpora and simulate diverse inputs. By unifying dynamic scenario simulation, causal risk decomposition, and closed-loop evaluation, the HEV Generative Sandbox provides a scalable, domain-sensitive methodology for responsible LLM deployment. This work contributes to advancing the safe deployment of LLMs by providing a comprehensive and automated risk evaluation framework.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af274d97-b6a2-493e-b528-ec30e8ebde37Builds on16
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
- Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial PromptsMikayel Samvelyan, Sharath Chandra Raparthy, Andrei Lupu, Eric Hambro et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 231 citations
- Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP Models with CheckListMarco Túlio Ribeiro, Tongshuang Wu, Carlos Guestrin, Sameer SinghACL 2020 · 51 citations
Related papers
- S-Eval: Towards Automated and Comprehensive Safety Evaluation for Large Language ModelsXiaohan Yuan, Jinfeng Li, Dongxia Wang, Yuefeng Chen et al.ISSTA 2025 · 4 citations
- Dynamic Evaluation with Cognitive Reasoning for Multi-turn Safety of Large Language ModelsLanxue Zhang, Yanan Cao, Yuqiang Xie, Fang Fang et al.ACL 2025
- Beyond Static Benchmarks: Synthesizing Harmful Content via Persona-based Simulation for Robust EvaluationHuije Lee, Jisu Shin, Hoyun Song, Changgeon Ko et al.ACL 2026
- PropensityBench: Evaluating Latent Safety Risks in Large Language Models via an Agentic ApproachUdari Madhushani Sehwag, Shayan Shabihi, Alex McAvoy, Vikash Sehwag et al.ICLR 2026 · 19 citations
- How Controllable Are Large Language Models? A Unified Evaluation across Behavioral GranularitiesZiwen Xu, Kewei Xu, Haoming Xu, Haiwen Hong et al.ACL 2026
