Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text Generation
Ameya Godbole, Nicholas Monath, Seungyeon Kim, Ankit Singh Rawat, Andrew McCallum, Manzil Zaheer
Abstract
In text generation, hallucinations refer to the generation of seemingly coherent text that contradicts established knowledge. One compelling hypothesis is that hallucinations occur when a language model is given a generation task outside its parametric knowledge (due to rarity, recency, domain, etc.). A common strategy to address this limitation is to infuse the language models with retrieval mechanisms, providing the model with relevant knowledge for the task. In this paper, we leverage the planning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs and analyze how planning can be used to guide retrieval to further reduce the frequency of hallucinations. We empirically evaluate several variations of our proposed approach on long-form text generation tasks. By improving the coverage of relevant facts, plan-guided retrieval and generation can produce more informative responses while providing a higher rate of attribution to source documents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext af14a5d6-0526-4303-930f-a3c267edd8acCited by top-tier papers2
- Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal DefinitionAbhinav Java, Ashmit Khandelwal, Sukruta Prakash Midigeshi, Aaron Halfaker et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- TROVE: A Challenge for Fine-Grained Text Provenance via Source Sentence Tracing and Relationship ClassificationJunnan Zhu, Min Xiao, Yining Wang, Feifei Zhai et al.ACL 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on21
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant ContextOri Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan BerantICLR 2024 · 361 citations
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
Related papers
- Active Retrieval Augmented GenerationZhengbao Jiang, Frank F. Xu, Luyu Gao, Zhiqing Sun et al.EMNLP 2023 · 315 citations
- Grounding by Trying: LLMs with Reinforcement Learning-Enhanced RetrievalSheryl Hsu, Omar Khattab, Chelsea Finn, Archit SharmaICLR 2025
- Fictitious Synthetic Data Can Improve LLM Factuality via Prerequisite LearningYujian Liu, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Yang ZhangICLR 2025
- Guidance: Sentence-Level Citation Enforcement via Prefix-Tail Guidance during LLM DecodingYirui Zhan, Xu, Jun GaoICML 2026
- FLAME : Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language ModelsSheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
