Fictitious Synthetic Data Can Improve LLM Factuality via Prerequisite Learning
Yujian Liu, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Yang Zhang
Abstract
Recent studies have identified one aggravating factor of LLM hallucinations as the knowledge inconsistency between pre-training and fine-tuning, where unfamiliar fine-tuning data mislead the LLM to fabricate plausible but wrong outputs. In this paper, we propose a novel fine-tuning strategy called PREREQ-TUNE to address this knowledge inconsistency and reduce hallucinations. Fundamentally, PREREQ-TUNE disentangles the learning of skills and knowledge, so the model learns only the task skills without being impacted by the knowledge inconsistency. To achieve this, PREREQ-TUNE introduces an additional prerequisite learning stage to learn the necessary knowledge for SFT, allowing subsequent SFT to focus only on task skills. PREREQ-TUNE can also be combined with fictitious synthetic data to enhance the grounding of LLM outputs to their internal knowledge. Experiments show that PREREQ-TUNE outperforms existing baselines in improving LLM's factuality across short QA and long-form generation tasks. It also opens new possibilities for knowledge-controlled generation in LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/UCSB-NLP-Chang/Prereq_tune.git .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 7422951a-d5b2-4283-8fa1-d01c28cdcf80Builds on29
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
Related papers
- FLAME : Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language ModelsSheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 53 citations
- DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language ModelsYung-Sung Chuang, Yujia Xie, Hongyin Luo, Yoon Kim et al.ICLR 2024 · 354 citations
- Knowledge Verification to Nip Hallucination in the BudFanqi Wan, Xinting Huang, Leyang Cui, Xiaojun Quan et al.EMNLP 2024 · 8 citations
- Alleviating Hallucinations from Knowledge Misalignment in Large Language Models via Selective Abstention LearningLei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Yuchun Fan et al.ACL 2025
