DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Models
Yung-Sung Chuang, Yujia Xie, Hongyin Luo, Yoon Kim, James R. Glass, Pengcheng He
Abstract
Despite their impressive capabilities, large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinations, i.e., generating content that deviates from facts seen during pretraining. We propose a simple decoding strategy for reducing hallucinations with pretrained LLMs that does not require conditioning on retrieved external knowledge nor additional finetuning. Our approach obtains the next-token distribution by contrasting the differences in logits obtained from projecting the later layers versus earlier layers to the vocabulary space, exploiting the fact that factual knowledge in an LLMs has generally been shown to be localized to particular transformer layers. We find that this Decoding by Contrasting Layers (DoLa) approach is able to better surface factual knowledge and reduce the generation of incorrect facts. DoLa consistently improves the truthfulness across multiple choices tasks and open-ended generation tasks, for example improving the performance of LLaMA family models on TruthfulQA by 12-17% absolute points, demonstrating its potential in making LLMs reliably generate truthful facts. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers217
- Fine-Tuning Language Models for FactualityKatherine Tian, Eric Mitchell, Huaxiu Yao, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination DetectionXuefeng Du, Chaowei Xiao, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2024 · 131 citations
- WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language ModelsPeng Wang, Zexi Li, Ningyu Zhang, Ziwen Xu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 125 citations
- LISA: Layerwise Importance Sampling for Memory-Efficient Large Language Model Fine-TuningRui Pan, Xiang Liu, Shizhe Diao, Renjie Pi et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 124 citations
- Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit DifferenceJiabao Ji, Yujian Liu, Yang Zhang, Gaowen Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 106 citations
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
Related papers
- Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Model GenerationHongxiang Zhang, Hao Chen, Muhao Chen, Tianyi ZhangEMNLP 2025 · 10 citations
- Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Language Models through Multi-Model Contrastive Decoding and Dynamic Hallucination DetectionChenyu Zhu, Yefeng Liu, Hao Zhang, Aowen Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- NDAD: Negative-Direction Aware Decoding for Large Language Models via Controllable Hallucination Signal InjectionPanjia Qiu, Mingyuan Fan, Cen Chen, Daixin WangICLR 2026
- MLLM can see? Dynamic Correction Decoding for Hallucination MitigationChenxi Wang, Xiang Chen, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian et al.ICLR 2025
- Fictitious Synthetic Data Can Improve LLM Factuality via Prerequisite LearningYujian Liu, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Yang ZhangICLR 2025
