Leveraging Constraint Violation Signals for Action Constrained Reinforcement Learning
Janaka Chathuranga Brahmanage, Jiajing Ling, Akshat Kumar
Abstract
In many RL applications, ensuring an agent's actions adhere to constraints is crucial for safety. Most previous methods in Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning (ACRL) employ a projection layer after the policy network to correct the action. However projection-based methods suffer from issues like the zero gradient problem and higher runtime due to the usage of optimization solvers. Recently methods were proposed to train generative models to learn a differentiable mapping between latent variables and feasible actions to address this issue. However, generative models require training using samples from the constrained action space, which itself is challenging. To address such limitations, first, we define a target distribution for feasible actions based on constraint violation signals, and train normalizing flows by minimizing the KL divergence between an approximated distribution over feasible actions and the target. This eliminates the need to generate feasible action samples, greatly simplifying the flow model learning. Second, we integrate the learned flow model with existing deep RL methods, which restrict it to exploring only the feasible action space. Third, we extend our approach beyond ACRL to handle state-wise constraints by learning the constraint violation signal from the environment. Empirically, our approach has significantly fewer constraint violations while achieving similar or better quality in several control tasks than previous best methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aeada05e-e250-4e29-b0d2-7f0230be1ea9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on3
- SurVAE Flows: Surjections to Bridge the Gap between VAEs and FlowsDidrik Nielsen, Priyank Jaini, Emiel Hoogeboom, Ole Winther et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 100 citations
- FlowPG: Action-constrained Policy Gradient with Normalizing FlowsJanaka Chathuranga Brahmanage, Jiajing Ling, Akshat KumarNeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
- Generative Modelling of Stochastic Actions with Arbitrary Constraints in Reinforcement LearningChangyu Chen, Ramesha Karunasena, Thanh Hong Nguyen, Arunesh Sinha et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Acceptance-Rejection Method and Augmented MDPsWei Hung, Shao-Hua Sun, Ping-Chun HsiehICLR 2025
- Geometric Control of Out-of-Distribution Shift in Safe Offline RLZhiqi Zhuang, di wu, Benoit BouletICML 2026
- PolyFlow: Safe and Efficient Polytope-Constrained Flow Matching with Constraint Embedding and Projection-free UpdateJianming Ma, Qiyue Yang, Yang Zhang, Liyun Yan et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Constrained Markov Decision Processes via Backward Value FunctionsHarsh Satija, Philip Amortila, Joelle PineauICML 2020 · 58 citations
- Latent Spherical Flow Policy for Reinforcement Learning with Combinatorial ActionsLingkai Kong, Anagha Satish, Hezi Jiang, Akseli Kangaslahti et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
