TOMATO: Assessing Visual Temporal Reasoning Capabilities in Multimodal Foundation Models
Ziyao Shangguan, Chuhan Li, Yuxuan Ding, Yanan Zheng, Yilun Zhao, Tesca Fitzgerald, Arman Cohan
Abstract
Existing benchmarks often highlight the remarkable performance achieved by state-of-the-art Multimodal Foundation Models (MFMs) in leveraging temporal context for video understanding. However, how well do the models truly perform visual temporal reasoning? Our study of existing benchmarks shows that this capability of MFMs is likely overestimated as many questions can be solved by using a single, few, or out-of-order frames. To systematically examine current visual temporal reasoning tasks, we propose three principles with corresponding metrics: (1) Multi-Frame Gain, (2) Frame Order Sensitivity, and (3) Frame Information Disparity. Following these principles, we introduce TOMATO, TempOral Reasoning MultimodAl EvaluaTiOn, a novel benchmark crafted to rigorously assess MFMs' temporal reasoning capabilities in video understanding. TOMATO comprises 1,484 carefully curated, human-annotated questions spanning six tasks (i.e., action count, direction, rotation, shape & trend, velocity & frequency, and visual cues), applied to 1,417 videos, including 805 self-recorded and -generated videos, that encompass human-centric, real-world, and simulated scenarios. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals a human-model performance gap of 57.3% with the best-performing model. Moreover, our in-depth analysis uncovers more fundamental limitations beyond this gap in current MFMs. While they can accurately recognize events in isolated frames, they fail to interpret these frames as a continuous sequence. We believe TOMATO will serve as a crucial testbed for evaluating the next-generation MFMs and as a call to the community to develop AI systems capable of comprehending the human world dynamics through the video modality. * Equal Contribution. TOMATO (Ours) TempCompass (Liu et al., 2024): What are the woman athletes doing? A. Cycling B. Swimming C. Running D. Dancing VITATECS (Li et al., 2023): Which of the following best describes the content of the video? A. Cheese is being spread B. Cheese is being sliced MVBench (Li et al., 2024): What is behind Monica when she is in the chair talking to Ross? A. A television B. Joey's white dog sculpture C. An American flag D. A Christmas tree E. A basket of laundry ReXTime (Chen et al., 2024): Why is the woman preparing ingredients and utensils? A.To make herself a sandwich B. To cook dinner for her family C. To bake a cake D. To prepare a salad In which direction(s) does the Ping Pong ball rotate? A. Clockwise throughout B. Counter-clockwise then clockwise C. Counter-clockwise throughout D. Clockwise then counter-clockwise
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ae68309f-52aa-4407-bae9-7cdebff6da9aCited by top-tier papers21
- Molmo2: Open Weights and Data for Vision-Language Models with Video Understanding and GroundingChristopher Clark, Jieyu Zhang, Zixian Ma, Jae Sung Park et al.CVPR 2026 · 144 citations
- Cambrian-S: Towards Spatial Supersensing in VideoShusheng Yang, Jihan Yang, Pinzhi Huang, Ellis Brown et al.ICLR 2026 · 139 citations
- PerceptionLM: Open-Access Data and Models for Detailed Visual UnderstandingJang Hyun Cho, Andrea Madotto, Effrosyni Mavroudi, Triantafyllos Afouras et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 97 citations
- PAI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark For Physical AIFengzhe Zhou, Jiannan Huang, Jialuo Li, Deva Ramanan et al.CVPR 2026 · 32 citations
- Visual Jigsaw Post-Training Improves MLLMsPenghao Wu, Yushan Zhang, Haiwen Diao, Bo Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 25 citations
Builds on10
- CLEVRER: Collision Events for Video Representation and ReasoningKexin Yi, Chuang Gan, Yunzhu Li, Pushmeet Kohli et al.ICLR 2020 · 584 citations
- Generating Diverse and Natural 3D Human Motions from TextChuan Guo, Shihao Zou, Xinxin Zuo, Sen Wang et al.CVPR 2022 · 462 citations
- Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before ProjectionBin Lin, Yang Ye, Bin Zhu, Jiaxi Cui et al.EMNLP 2024 · 231 citations
- Learning to Answer Questions in Dynamic Audio-Visual ScenariosGuangyao Li, Yake Wei, Yapeng Tian, Chenliang Xu et al.CVPR 2022 · 101 citations
- Revealing Single Frame Bias for Video-and-Language LearningJie Lei, Tamara L. Berg, Mohit BansalACL 2023 · 68 citations
Related papers
- Temporal Reasoning Transfer from Text to VideoLei Li, Yuanxin Liu, Linli Yao, Peiyuan Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
- UniVBench: Towards Unified Evaluation for Video Foundation ModelsJianhui Wei, Xiaotian Zhang, Yichen Li, Yuan Wang et al.CVPR 2026 · 12 citations
- TiViBench: Benchmarking Think-in-Video Reasoning for Video GenerationHarold Haodong Chen, Disen Lan, Wen-Jie Shu, Qingyang Liu et al.CVPR 2026
- SciVideoBench: Benchmarking Scientific Video Reasoning in Large Multimodal ModelsAndong Deng, Taojiannan Yang, Shoubin Yu, Lincoln Spencer et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding BenchmarkKunchang Li, Yali Wang, Yinan He, Yizhuo Li et al.CVPR 2024
