V-InFoR: A Robust Graph Neural Networks Explainer for Structurally Corrupted Graphs
Senzhang Wang, Jun Yin, Chaozhuo Li, Xing Xie, Jianxin Wang
Abstract
GNN explanation method aims to identify an explanatory subgraph which contains the most informative components of the full graph. However, a major limitation of existing GNN explainers is that they are not robust to the structurally corrupted graphs, e.g., graphs with noisy or adversarial edges. On the one hand, existing GNN explainers mostly explore explanations based on either the raw graph features or the learned latent representations, both of which can be easily corrupted. On the other hand, the corruptions in graphs are irregular in terms of the structural properties, e.g., the size or connectivity of graphs, which makes the rigorous constraints used by previous GNN explainers unfeasible. To address these issues, we propose a robust GNN explainer called V-InfoR 3 . Specifically, a robust graph representation extractor, which takes insights of variational inference, is proposed to infer the latent distribution of graph representations. Instead of directly using the corrupted raw features or representations of each single graph, we sample the graph representations from the inferred distribution for the downstream explanation generator, which can effectively eliminate the minor corruption. We next formulate the explanation exploration as a graph information bottleneck (GIB) optimization problem. As a more general method that does not need any rigorous structural constraints, our GIB-based method can adaptively capture both the regularity and irregularity of the severely corrupted graphs for explanation. Extensive evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets indicate that V-InfoR significantly improves the GNN explanation performance for the structurally corrupted graphs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards Robust Heterogeneous Graph Explanations under Structural PerturbationsYifan Lu, Pengfei Jiao, Xuan Guo, Ziyun Zou et al.WWW 2026
- Paradigm Shift of GNN Explainer from Label Space to Prototypical Representation SpaceJun Yin, Senzhang Wang, Ziluowen Luo, Peng Huo et al.ICLR 2026
- What Information Matters? Graph Out-of-Distribution Detection via Tri-Component Information DecompositionDanny Wang, Ruihong Qiu, Zi HuangICML 2026
- Provably Robust Explainable Graph Neural Networks against Graph Perturbation AttacksJiate Li, Meng Pang, Yun Dong, Jinyuan Jia et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on16
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
- Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural NetworksWei Jin, Yao Ma, Xiaorui Liu, Xianfeng Tang et al.KDD 2020 · 604 citations
- PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural NetworksMinh N. Vu, My T. ThaiNeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- ASAP: Adaptive Structure Aware Pooling for Learning Hierarchical Graph RepresentationsEkagra Ranjan, Soumya Sanyal, Partha P. TalukdarAAAI 2020 · 400 citations
Related papers
- Improving Subgraph Recognition with Variational Graph Information BottleneckJunchi Yu, Jie Cao, Ran HeCVPR 2022 · 56 citations
- Graph Information BottleneckTailin Wu, Hongyu Ren, Pan Li, Jure LeskovecNeurIPS 2020 · 366 citations
- Factorized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksRundong Huang, Farhad Shirani, Dongsheng LuoAAAI 2024 · 16 citations
- Is Your Explanation Reliable: Confidence-Aware Explanation on Graph Neural NetworksJiaxing Zhang, Xiaoou Liu, Dongsheng Luo, Hua WeiKDD 2025 · 1 citation
- MixupExplainer: Generalizing Explanations for Graph Neural Networks with Data AugmentationJiaxing Zhang, Dongsheng Luo, Hua WeiKDD 2023 · 20 citations
