Paradigm Shift of GNN Explainer from Label Space to Prototypical Representation Space
Jun Yin, Senzhang Wang, Ziluowen Luo, Peng Huo, Hao Yan, Hao Miao, Chaozhuo Li, Shirui Pan, Chengqi Zhang
Abstract
Post-hoc instance-level graph neural network (GNN) explainers are developed to identify a compact subgraph (i.e., explanation) that encompasses the most influential components for each input graph. A fundamental limitation of existing methods lies in the insufficient utilization of structural information during GNN explainer optimization. They typically optimize the explainer by aligning the GNN predictions of input graph and its explanation in the graph label space which inherently lacks expressiveness to describe various graph structures. Motivated by the powerful structural expression ability of vectorized graph representations, we for the first time propose to shift the GNN explainer optimization from the graph label space to the graph representation space. However, the paradigm shift is challenging due to both the entanglement between the explanatory and non-explanatory substructures, and the distributional discrepancy between the input graph and the explanation subgraph. To this end, we meticulously design IDEA 1 , a universal dual-stage optimization framework grounded in a prototypical graph representation space, which can generalize across diverse existing GNN explainer architectures. Specifically, in the Structural Information Disentanglement stage, a graph tokenizer equipped with a structure-aware disentanglement objective is designed to disentangle the explanatory substructures and encapsulate them into explanatory prototypes. In the Explanatory Prototype Alignment stage, IDEA aligns the representational distributions of the input graph and its explanation unified in the prototypical representation space, to optimize the GNN explainer. Comprehensive experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of IDEA, with the average improvements of ROC-AUC by 4.45% and precision by 48.71%. We further integrate IDEA with diverse explainer architectures and achieve an improvement by up to 10.70%, which verifies its generalizability.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 481314ef-7452-43c3-b5ec-f6b7fe7af2bcBuilds on21
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for RecommendationXiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li et al.SIGIR 2020 · 4,448 citations
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information MaximizationFan-Yun Sun, Jordan Hoffmann, Vikas Verma, Jian TangICLR 2020 · 1,010 citations
- Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural NetworkDongsheng Luo, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu, Wenchao Yu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 888 citations
Related papers
- Empower Post-hoc Graph Explanations with Information Bottleneck: A Pre-training and Fine-tuning PerspectiveJihong Wang, Minnan Luo, Jundong Li, Yun Lin et al.KDD 2023 · 5 citations
- ProtGNN: Towards Self-Explaining Graph Neural NetworksZaixi Zhang, Qi Liu, Hao Wang, Chengqiang Lu et al.AAAI 2022 · 173 citations
- Self-Interpretable Subgraph Neural Network with Deep Reinforcement Walk ExplorationJianming Huang, Hiroyuki KasaiAAAI 2026
- Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksCaihua Shan, Yifei Shen, Yao Zhang, Xiang Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
- Multi-scale Explainer for Graph Neural NetworksLutong Wu, Shiying Cheng, Zhiqiang Wang, Jianqing Liang et al.ICML 2026
