Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?
Taehyun Cho, Seokhun Ju, Seungyub Han, Dohyeong Kim, Kyungjae Lee, Jungwoo Lee
Abstract
To design rewards that align with human goals, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a prominent technique for learning reward functions from human preferences and optimizing policies via reinforcement learning algorithms. However, existing RLHF methods often misinterpret trajectories as being generated by an optimal policy, causing inaccurate likelihood estimation and suboptimal learning. Inspired by Direct Preference Optimization framework which directly learns optimal policy without explicit reward, we propose policy-labeled preference learning (PPL), to resolve likelihood mismatch issues by modeling human preferences with regret, which reflects behavior policy information. We also provide a contrastive KL regularization, derived from regret-based principles, to enhance RLHF in sequential decision making. Experiments in high-dimensional continuous control tasks demonstrate PPL's significant improvements in offline RLHF performance and its effectiveness in online settings. For more information, visit our project page: https://jjush.github. io/PPL/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Pareto Optimal Risk-Agnostic Distributional Bandits with Heavy-Tail RewardsKyungjae Lee, Dohyeong Kim, Taehyun Cho, Chaeyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2025
- PAWS: Preference Learning with Advantage-Weighted SegmentsAleksandar Taranovic, Onur Celik, Niklas Freymuth, Ge Li et al.ICML 2026
- A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language ModelsSuhwan Kim, Taehyun Cho, Youngsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim et al.ICML 2026
Builds on21
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingKimin Lee, Laura M. Smith, Pieter AbbeelICML 2021 · 380 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
- Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence ConstraintsChaoqi Wang, Yibo Jiang, Chenghao Yang, Han Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
Related papers
- Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without Reinforcement LearningJoey Hejna, Rafael Rafailov, Harshit Sikchi, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference ModelChenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Hanze Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward ModelingGaon An, Junhyeok Lee, Xingdong Zuo, Norio Kosaka et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 61 citations
- PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward ModelingYunzhen Feng, Ariel Kwiatkowski, Kunhao Zheng, Julia Kempe et al.ICML 2025
- Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human PreferencesAndi Nika, Debmalya Mandal, Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Georgios Tzannetos et al.ICML 2024 · 22 citations
