PILAF: Optimal Human Preference Sampling for Reward Modeling
Yunzhen Feng, Ariel Kwiatkowski, Kunhao Zheng, Julia Kempe, Yaqi Duan
Abstract
As large language models increasingly drive real-world applications, aligning them with human values becomes paramount. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a key technique, translating preference data into reward models when oracle human values remain inaccessible. In practice, RLHF mostly relies on approximate reward models, which may not consistently guide the policy toward maximizing the underlying human values. We propose Policy-Interpolated Learning for Aligned Feedback (PILAF), a novel response sampling strategy for preference labeling that explicitly aligns preference learning with maximizing the underlying oracle reward. PILAF is theoretically grounded, demonstrating optimality from both an optimization and a statistical perspective. The method is straightforward to implement and demonstrates strong performance in iterative and online RLHF settings where feedback curation is critical.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3fb56646-4ee9-4d29-b576-53b637e5d173Cited by top-tier papers5
- Asymmetric REINFORCE for off-Policy Reinforcement Learning: Balancing positive and negative rewardsCharles Arnal, Gaëtan Narozniak, Vivien Cabannes, Yunhao Tang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Limited Preference Data? Learning Better Reward Model with Latent Space SynthesisLeitian Tao, Xuefeng Du, Sharon LiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Online Compatible Reward Identification from Preference FeedbackSimone Drago, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2026
- -Divergence Regularized RLHF: Two Tales of Sampling and Unified AnalysesDi Wu, Chengshuai Shi, Jing Yang, Cong ShenICML 2026
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without Reinforcement LearningJoey Hejna, Rafael Rafailov, Harshit Sikchi, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Value-Incentivized Preference Optimization: A Unified Approach to Online and Offline RLHFShicong Cen, Jincheng Mei, Katayoon Goshvadi, Hanjun Dai et al.ICLR 2025
- On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHFTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Mingxiao Li, Zhengyu Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- Influence-based Online Experience Selection for Effective RLHFYifan Gong, Jing Yao, Xiting Wang, Xunlong Wang et al.ACL 2026
- Nash Learning from Human FeedbackRémi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar et al.ICML 2024 · 212 citations
