Thought of Search: Planning with Language Models Through The Lens of Efficiency
Michael Katz, Harsha Kokel, Kavitha Srinivas, Shirin Sohrabi
Abstract
Among the most important properties of algorithms investigated in computer science are soundness, completeness, and complexity. These properties, however, are rarely analyzed for the vast collection of recently proposed methods for planning with large language models. In this work, we alleviate this gap. We analyse these properties of using LLMs for planning and highlight that recent trends abandon both soundness and completeness for the sake of inefficiency. We propose a significantly more efficient approach that can, at the same time, maintain both soundness and completeness. We exemplify on four representative search problems, comparing to the LLM-based solutions from the literature that attempt to solve these problems. We show that by using LLMs to produce the code for the search components we can solve the entire datasets with 100% accuracy with only a few calls to the LLM. We argue for a responsible use of compute resources; urging research community to investigate sound and complete LLM-based approaches that uphold efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ad08cd9b-b4b2-42e5-b593-e65f21a85e96Cited by top-tier papers5
- PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning CapabilitiesHui Wei, Zihao Zhang, Shenghua He, Tian Xia et al.ACL 2025 · 78 citations
- Classical Planning with LLM-Generated Heuristics: Challenging the State of the Art with Python CodeAugusto B. Corrêa, André Grahl Pereira, Jendrik SeippNeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
- Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated PlanningMarkus Fritzsche, Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik SeippAAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- PEARL: Self-Evolving Assistant for Time Management with Reinforcement LearningBingxuan Li, Jeonghwan Kim, Cheng Qian, Xiusi Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Comfrey: Mitigating Integration Failures in LLM-enabled Software at Run-TimeYuchen Shao, Yuheng Huang, Jiazhen Zou, Yuling Shi et al.ICSE 2026
Builds on11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
- On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models - A Critical InvestigationKarthik Valmeekam, Matthew Marquez, Sarath Sreedharan, Subbarao KambhampatiNeurIPS 2023 · 509 citations
Related papers
- Can LLMs Fix Issues with Reasoning Models? Towards More Likely Models for AI PlanningTurgay Caglar, Sirine Belhaj, Tathagata Chakraborti, Michael Katz et al.AAAI 2024 · 11 citations
- Graph-enhanced Large Language Models in Asynchronous Plan ReasoningFangru Lin, Emanuele La Malfa, Valentin Hofmann, Elle Michelle Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 33 citations
- SayCanPay: Heuristic Planning with Large Language Models Using Learnable Domain KnowledgeRishi Hazra, Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Luc De RaedtAAAI 2024 · 74 citations
- Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task PlanningZirui Zhao, Wee Sun Lee, David HsuNeurIPS 2023 · 423 citations
- Planning Anything with Rigor: General-Purpose Zero-Shot Planning with LLM-based Formalized ProgrammingYilun Hao, Yang Zhang, Chuchu FanICLR 2025
