Lune

STOC2025Top-tier venue

QMA vs QCMA and Pseudorandomness

Jiahui Liu, Saachi Mutreja, Henry Yuen

2025Year
5Citations
5Top-tier citations

Abstract

We study a longstanding question of Aaronson and Kuperberg on whether there exists a classical oracle separating QMA from QCMA. Settling this question in either direction would yield insight into the power of quantum proofs over classical proofs. We show that such an oracle exists if a certain quantum pseudorandomness conjecture holds. Roughly speaking, the conjecture posits that quantum algorithms cannot, by making few queries, distinguish between the uniform distribution over permutations versus permutations drawn from so-called “dense” distributions. Our result can be viewed as establishing a “win-win” scenario: either there is a classical oracle separation of QMA from QCMA, or there is quantum advantage in distinguishing pseudorandom distributions on permutations.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers5

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines