Supporting Collaborative Sequencing of Small Groups through Visual Awareness
Tae Soo Kim, Nitesh Goyal, Jeongyeon Kim, Juho Kim, Sungsoo Ray Hong
Abstract
Collaborative Sequencing (CoSeq) is the process by which a group collaboratively constructs a sequence. CoSeq is ubiquitous, occurring across diverse situations like trip planning, course scheduling, or book writing. Building a consensus on a sequence is desirable to groups. However, accomplishing this requires groups to dedicate significant effort to comprehensively discuss preferences and resolve conflicts. Furthermore, as numerous decisions must be assessed to construct a sequence, this challenge can be exacerbated in CoSeq. However, little research has aimed to effectively support consensus building in CoSeq. As a first step to systematically understand and support consensus building in CoSeq, we conducted a formative study to gain insights into how visual awareness may facilitate the holistic recognition of preferences and the resolution of conflicts within a group. From the study, we identified design requirements to support consensus building and designed a novel visual awareness technique for CoSeq. We instantiated this design in a collaborative travel itinerary planning system, Twine, and conducted a summative study to evaluate its effects. We found that visual awareness could decrease the effort of communicating preferences by 21%, and participants' comments suggest that it also encouraged group members to behave more cooperatively when building a consensus. We discuss future research directions to further explore the needs and challenges in this unique context and to advance the development of support for CoSeq tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ac2227aa-9f2d-4fb4-b5b4-eb596a3b3a83Cited by top-tier papers3
- Retrospector: Rapid collaborative reflection to improve collaborative practicesSoya Park, Chinmay KulkarniCSCW 2023 · 7 citations
- EchoMind: Supporting Real-time Complex Problem Discussions through Human-AI Collaborative FacilitationWeihao Chen, Chun Yu, Yukun Wang, Meizhu Chen et al.CSCW 2025 · 5 citations
- It's a Complete Haystack: Understanding Dependency Management Needs in Computer-Aided DesignKathy Cheng, Alison Olechowski, Shurui ZhouCSCW 2025 · 4 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Space, Time, and Choice: A Unified Approach to Flexible Personal SchedulingVicky Bilbily, Elaine Huynh, Karan Singh, Fanny ChevalierUIST 2021 · 5 citations
- Sequence Braiding: Visual Overviews of Temporal Event Sequences and AttributesSara Di Bartolomeo, Yixuan Zhang, Fangfang Sheng, Cody DunneIEEE VIS 2020 · 41 citations
- Virtual Minds, Real Work: LLM-Powered Preference-Based Planning through Spatial Multi-Agent-Human CollaborationZiyi Zhang, Xin Yi, Zitong Dai, Xuewen Yu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent CollaborationYijia Shao, Vinay Samuel, Yucheng Jiang, John Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 57 citations
- Abstractions for Visualizing Preferences in Group DecisionsEmily Hindalong, Jordon Johnson, Giuseppe Carenini, Tamara MunznerCSCW 2022 · 11 citations
