Learning for Edge-Weighted Online Bipartite Matching with Robustness Guarantees
Pengfei Li, Jianyi Yang, Shaolei Ren
Abstract
Many problems, such as online ad display, can be formulated as online bipartite matching. The crucial challenge lies in the nature of sequentially-revealed online item information, based on which we make irreversible matching decisions at each step. While numerous expert online algorithms have been proposed with bounded worst-case competitive ratios, they may not offer satisfactory performance in average cases. On the other hand, reinforcement learning (RL) has been applied to improve the average performance, but it lacks robustness and can perform arbitrarily poorly. In this paper, we propose a novel RL-based approach to edge-weighted online bipartite matching with robustness guarantees (LOMAR), achieving both good average-case and worst-case performance. The key novelty of LOMAR is a new online switching operation which, based on a judicious condition to hedge against future uncertainties, decides whether to follow the expert's decision or the RL decision for each online item. We prove that for any , LOMAR is -competitive against any given expert online algorithm. To improve the average performance, we train the RL policy by explicitly considering the online switching operation. Finally, we run empirical experiments to demonstrate the advantages of LOMAR compared to existing baselines. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Ren-Research/LOMAR
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext abe44add-340d-4ef3-bbc0-2cf16ce2d3efCited by top-tier papers5
- Online bipartite matching with imperfect adviceDavin Choo, Themistoklis Gouleakis, Chun Kai Ling, Arnab BhattacharyyaICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Rethinking Order Dispatching in Online Ride-Hailing PlatformsZhaoxing Yang, Haiming Jin, Guiyun Fan, Min Lu et al.KDD 2024 · 5 citations
- MAGNOLIA: Matching Algorithms via GNNs for Online Value-to-go ApproximationAlexandre Hayderi, Amin Saberi, Ellen Vitercik, Anders WikumICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Online Matching with Stochastic Rewards: Provable Better Bound via Adversarial Reinforcement LearningQiankun Zhang, Aocheng Shen, Boyu Zhang, Hanrui Jiang et al.ICML 2024 · 2 citations
- DiMa: Understanding the Hardness of Online Matching Problems via Diffusion ModelsBoyu Zhang, Aocheng Shen, Bing Liu, Qiankun Zhang et al.ICML 2025
Builds on14
- Projection-Based Constrained Policy OptimizationTsung-Yen Yang, Justinian Rosca, Karthik Narasimhan, Peter J. RamadgeICLR 2020 · 306 citations
- Online metric algorithms with untrusted predictionsAntonios Antoniadis, Christian Coester, Marek Eliás, Adam Polak et al.ICML 2020 · 170 citations
- Secretary and Online Matching Problems with Machine Learned AdviceAntonios Antoniadis, Themis Gouleakis, Pieter Kleer, Pavel KolevNeurIPS 2020 · 167 citations
- Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online AlgorithmsAlexander Wei, Fred ZhangNeurIPS 2020 · 129 citations
- Learning MDPs from Features: Predict-Then-Optimize for Sequential Decision Making by Reinforcement LearningKai Wang, Sanket Shah, Haipeng Chen, Andrew Perrault et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 44 citations
Related papers
- Learning-Augmented Online Bipartite Fractional MatchingDavin Choo, Billy Jin, Yongho ShinNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Edge-weighted Online Stochastic Matching: BeatingShuyi YanSODA 2024 · 7 citations
- (Fractional) online stochastic matching via fine-grained offline statisticsZhihao Gavin Tang, Jinzhao Wu, Hongxun WuSTOC 2022 · 9 citations
- Multiway Online Correlated SelectionGuy Blanc, Moses CharikarFOCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Secretary Matching with Vertex Arrivals and No RejectionsMohak GoyalAAAI 2022 · 3 citations
