A Theory of Contrastive Learning with Natural Images
Antonio Torralba, Yair Weiss
Abstract
Why does contrastive learning with simple images and augmentations yield useful representations for downstream tasks? We address this question by analytically computing the optimal representation in terms of the contrastive loss for a range of basic augmentations and any image dataset with stationary statistics. We show that for certain augmentations the optimum can be attained by a CNN whose first layer filters are sinusoids, followed by a pointwise nonlinearity, global average pooling, and a final linear layer that performs partial whitening. We also show that the optimal weights in such CNNs for more complicated augmentations are still sinusoids. The frequencies of the sinusoids and their weights can be computed using a simple "waterfilling" algorithm given the dataset's expected power spectrum. Experiments with different image datasets and augmentations show that such CNNs trained with SGD empirically learn sinusoids in their first layer and to perform partial whitening. Contrastive learning (CL) is a remarkably successful method for learning useful image representations without labeled data. While numerous variants have been suggested, almost all of them follow the recipe suggested by (Chen et al., 2020) . For each training image, an augmentation is applied, and the goal of learning is to find a representation where two augmentations of the same image are close, while augmentations of different images are far away. Although conceptually simple, when applied to large scale datasets, these approaches have paved the way for image representations that can then be used to solve a large number of computer vision tasks without requiring additional representation learning (e.g.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy ReductionJure Zbontar, Li Jing, Ishan Misra, Yann LeCun et al.ICML 2021 · 2,942 citations
- Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the HypersphereTongzhou Wang, Phillip IsolaICML 2020 · 2,360 citations
- VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised LearningAdrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, Yann LeCunICLR 2022 · 1,226 citations
Related papers
- What do CNNs Learn in the First Layer and Why? A Linear Systems PerspectiveRhea Chowers, Yair WeissICML 2023 · 5 citations
- A Statistical Theory of Contrastive Learning via Approximate Sufficient StatisticsLicong Lin, Song MeiNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive LearningZixin Wen, Yuanzhi LiICML 2021 · 162 citations
- Integrating Prior Knowledge in Contrastive Learning with KernelBenoit Dufumier, Carlo Alberto Barbano, Robin Louiset, Edouard Duchesnay et al.ICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Whitening for Self-Supervised Representation LearningAleksandr Ermolov, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Enver Sangineto, Nicu SebeICML 2021 · 378 citations
