USENIX Security2025Top-tier venue
URL Inspection Tasks: Helping Users Detect Phishing Links in Emails
Daniele Lain, Yoshimichi Nakatsuka, Kari Kostiainen, Gene Tsudik, Srdjan Capkun
Abstract
The most widespread type of phishing attack involves email messages with links pointing to malicious content. Despite user training and the use of detection techniques, these attacks are still highly effective. Recent studies show that it is user inattentiveness, rather than lack of education, that is one of the key factors in successful phishing attacks. To this end, we develop a novel phishing defense mechanism based on URL inspection tasks: small challenges (loosely inspired by CAPTCHAs) that, to be solved, require users to interact with, and understand, the basic URL structure. We implemented and evaluated three tasks that act as ``barriers'' to visiting the website: (1) correct click-selection from a list of URLs, (2) mouse-based highlighting of the domain-name URL component, and (3) re-typing the domain-name. These tasks follow best practices in security interfaces and warning design. We assessed the efficacy of these tasks through an extensive on-line user study with 2,673 participants from three different cultures, native languages, and alphabets. Results show that these tasks significantly decrease the rate of successful phishing attempts, compared to the baseline case. Results also showed the highest efficacy for difficult URLs, such as typo-squats, with which participants struggled the most. This highlights the importance of (1) slowing down users while focusing their attention and (2) helping them understand the URL structure (especially, the domain-name component thereof) and matching it to their intent.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aaf0e6ed-3cc8-409b-8632-ed7c2c621abcCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Phishing in Organizations: Findings from a Large-Scale and Long-Term StudyDaniele Lain, Kari Kostiainen, Srdjan CapkunS&P 2022 · 92 citations
- What is this URL's Destination? Empirical Evaluation of Users' URL ReadingSara Albakry, Kami Vaniea, Maria K. WoltersCHI 2020 · 48 citations
- I Don't Need an Expert! Making URL Phishing Features Human ComprehensibleKholoud Althobaiti, Nicole Meng, Kami VanieaCHI 2021 · 32 citations
- Measuring Identity Confusion with Uniform Resource LocatorsJoshua Reynolds, Deepak Kumar, Zane Ma, Rohan Subramanian et al.CHI 2020 · 30 citations
- Phish in Sheep's Clothing: Exploring the Authentication Pitfalls of Browser FingerprintingXu Lin, Panagiotis Ilia, Saumya Solanki, Jason PolakisUSENIX Security 2022
Related papers
- Restricting the Link: Effects of Focused Attention and Time Delay on Phishing Warning EffectivenessJustin Petelka, Benjamin Berens, Carlo Sugatan, Melanie Volkamer et al.S&P 2025
- Knowledge Expansion and Counterfactual Interaction for Reference-Based Phishing DetectionRuofan Liu, Yun Lin, Yifan Zhang, Penn Han Lee et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Characterizing and Mitigating Phishing Attacks at ccTLD ScaleGiovane C. M. Moura, Thomas Daniels, Maarten Bosteels, Sebastian Castro et al.CCS 2024 · 7 citations
- Assessing Browser-level Defense against IDN-based PhishingHang Hu, Steve T. K. Jan, Yang Wang, Gang WangUSENIX Security 2021 · 22 citations
- Misdirection of Trust: Demystifying the Abuse of Dedicated URL Shortening ServiceZhibo Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zhangyue Zhang, Geng Hong et al.NDSS 2025
