Lune

S&P2025Top-tier venue

Restricting the Link: Effects of Focused Attention and Time Delay on Phishing Warning Effectiveness

Justin Petelka, Benjamin Berens, Carlo Sugatan, Melanie Volkamer, Florian Schaub

2025Year
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Phishing warning researchers have proposed two forms of hyperlink restrictions for reducing phishing click-through rates: focused attention, which prevents users from proceeding to a suspicious URL until they click the uncovered link inside the warning; and time delay, which disables link clicking for a short period of time. Both measures aim to draw user attention to the warning and nudge them to carefully evaluate the respective link's URL. However, the effectiveness of these measures has so far not been comparatively evaluated. We conducted a mixed-methods online experiment (n=1,320) to understand differences in the effectiveness of focused attention and time delay both independently and together. Our study used an instrumented email inbox environment, in which participants were asked to assess emails and email hyper-links. We found that, while both focused attention and time delay reduced click-through rates independently, the strength of these effects were significantly different from each other with focused attention being more effective than time delay. Combining both measures reduced CTR even further. We also found that participants who saw a warning with a time delay were more likely to hover over hyperlinks for longer than those who saw a focused attention warning. We discuss the implications of our findings for the design of anti-phishing warnings.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines