MPS-Prover: Advancing Stepwise Theorem Proving by Multi-Perspective Search and Data Curation
Zhenwen Liang, Linfeng Song, Yang Li, Tao Yang, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu
Abstract
Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) in formal languages remains a formidable challenge in AI, demanding rigorous logical deduction and navigating vast search spaces. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promising performance, existing stepwise provers often suffer from biased search guidance, leading to inefficiencies and suboptimal proof strategies. This paper introduces the Multi-Perspective Search Prover (MPS-Prover), a novel stepwise ATP system designed to overcome these limitations. MPS-Prover incorporates two key innovations: a highly effective post-training data curation strategy that prunes approximately 40% of redundant training data without sacrificing performance, and a multi-perspective tree search mechanism. This search integrates a learned critic model with strategically designed heuristic rules to diversify tactic selection, prevent getting trapped in unproductive states, and enhance search robustness. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that MPS-Prover achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple challenging benchmarks, including miniF2F and ProofNet, outperforming prior 7B parameter models. Furthermore, our analyses reveal that MPS-Prover generates significantly shorter and more diverse proofs compared to existing stepwise and whole-proof methods, highlighting its efficiency and efficacy. Our work advances the capabilities of LLM-based formal reasoning and offers a robust framework and a comprehensive analysis for developing more powerful theorem provers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aae60fdd-abd1-495c-b309-43519fcdded0Cited by top-tier papers3
- Scaling up Multi-Turn Off-Policy RL and Multi-Agent Tree Search for LLM Step-ProversRan Xin, Zeyu Zheng, Yanchen Nie, Kun Yuan et al.ICML 2026 · 20 citations
- Mathesis: Towards Formal Theorem Proving from Natural LanguagesXuejun Yu, Jianyuan Zhong, Zijin Feng, Pengyi Zhai et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- EconProver: Towards More Economical Test-Time Scaling for Automated Theorem ProvingMukai Li, Linfeng Song, Zhenwen Liang, Jiahao Xu et al.ACL 2026
Builds on12
- HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem ProvingGuillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 271 citations
- LEGO-Prover: Neural Theorem Proving with Growing LibrariesHaiming Wang, Huajian Xin, Chuanyang Zheng, Zhengying Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 125 citations
- Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language ModelsEmily First, Markus N. Rabe, Talia Ringer, Yuriy BrunFSE 2023 · 89 citations
- BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem ProvingRan Xin, Chenguang Xi, Jie Yang, Feng Chen et al.ACL 2025 · 66 citations
- Proving Theorems RecursivelyHaiming Wang, Huajian Xin, Zhengying Liu, Wenda Li et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 34 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Correctness: Exposing LLM-generated Logical Flaws in Reasoning via Multi-step Automated Theorem ProvingXinyi Zheng, Ningke Li, Xiaokun Luan, Wang Kailong et al.ICSE 2026
- QDTSynth: Quality-Driven Formal Theorem Synthesis for Enhancing Proving Performance of LLMsLei Wang, Ruobing Zuo, Gaolei He, Jianlin Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- CARTS: Advancing Neural Theorem Proving with Diversified Tactic Calibration and Bias-Resistant Tree SearchXiao-Wen Yang, Zhi Zhou, Haiming Wang, Aoxue Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Enhancing Neural Theorem Proving via High-Quality Proof Selection and Verifier FeedbackXiaoxue Zhu, Jilin Hu, Fuyuan Zhang, Jianyu Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- BC-Prover: Backward Chaining Prover for Formal Theorem ProvingYuhang He, Jihai Zhang, Jianzhu Bao, Fangquan Lin et al.EMNLP 2024
