CARTS: Advancing Neural Theorem Proving with Diversified Tactic Calibration and Bias-Resistant Tree Search
Xiao-Wen Yang, Zhi Zhou, Haiming Wang, Aoxue Li, Wen-Da Wei, Hui Jin, Zhenguo Li, Yu-Feng Li
Abstract
Recent advancements in neural theorem proving integrate large language models with tree search algorithms like Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), where the language model suggests tactics and the tree search finds the complete proof path. However, many tactics proposed by the language model converge to semantically or strategically similar, reducing diversity and increasing search costs by expanding redundant proof paths. This issue exacerbates as computation scales and more tactics are explored per state. Furthermore, the trained value function suffers from false negatives, label imbalance, and domain gaps due to biased data construction. To address these challenges, we propose CARTS (diversified tactic CAlibration and bias-Resistant Tree Search), which balances tactic diversity and importance while calibrating model confidence. CARTS also introduce preference modeling and an adjustment term related to the ratio of valid tactics to improve the biasresistance of the value function. Experimental results demonstrate that CARTS consistently outperforms previous methods achieving a pass@l rate of 49.6% on the miniF2F-test benchmark. Further analysis confirms that CARTS improves tactic diversity and leads to a more balanced tree search. The code for our implementation is available at https://github.com/njuyxw/CARTS .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 920a7475-0ba9-4479-8579-4c7c82ec6323Builds on12
- Llemma: An Open Language Model for MathematicsZhangir Azerbayev, Hailey Schoelkopf, Keiran Paster, Marco Dos Santos et al.ICLR 2024 · 433 citations
- miniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicsKunhao Zheng, Jesse Michael Han, Stanislas PoluICLR 2022 · 342 citations
- HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem ProvingGuillaume Lample, Timothée Lacroix, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Aurélien Rodriguez et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 271 citations
- Chain of Preference Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMsXuan Zhang, Chao Du, Tianyu Pang, Qian Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 177 citations
- Proof Artifact Co-Training for Theorem Proving with Language ModelsJesse Michael Han, Jason Rute, Yuhuai Wu, Edward W. Ayers et al.ICLR 2022 · 149 citations
Related papers
- DT-Solver: Automated Theorem Proving with Dynamic-Tree Sampling Guided by Proof-level Value FunctionHaiming Wang, Ye Yuan, Zhengying Liu, Jianhao Shen et al.ACL 2023 · 5 citations
- QDTSynth: Quality-Driven Formal Theorem Synthesis for Enhancing Proving Performance of LLMsLei Wang, Ruobing Zuo, Gaolei He, Jianlin Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 1 citation
- MPS-Prover: Advancing Stepwise Theorem Proving by Multi-Perspective Search and Data CurationZhenwen Liang, Linfeng Song, Yang Li, Tao Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Enhancing Neural Theorem Proving via High-Quality Proof Selection and Verifier FeedbackXiaoxue Zhu, Jilin Hu, Fuyuan Zhang, Jianyu Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- 3D-Prover: Diversity Driven Theorem Proving With Determinantal Point ProcessesSean Lamont, Christian Walder, Amir Dezfouli, Paul Montague et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
