USENIX Security2022Top-tier venue
RE-Mind: a First Look Inside the Mind of a Reverse Engineer
Alessandro Mantovani, Simone Aonzo, Yanick Fratantonio, Davide Balzarotti
Abstract
When a human activity requires a lot of expertise and very specialized cognitive skills that are poorly understood by the general population, it is often considered 'an art.' Different activities in the security domain have fallen in this category, such as exploitation, hacking, and the main focus of this paper: binary reverse engineering (RE). However, while experts in many areas (ranging from chess players to computer programmers) have been studied by scientists to understand their mental models and capture what is special about their behavior, the 'art' of understanding binary code and solving reverse engineering puzzles remains to date a black box. In this paper, we present a measurement of the different strategies adopted by expert and beginner reverse engineers while approaching the analysis of x86 (dis)assembly code, a typical static RE task. We do that by performing an exploratory analysis of data collected over 16,325 minutes of RE activity of two unknown binaries from 72 participants with different experience levels: 39 novices and 33 experts.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers23
- Ahoy SAILR! There is No Need to DREAM of C: A Compiler-Aware Structuring Algorithm for Binary DecompilationZion Leonahenahe Basque, Ati Priya Bajaj, Wil Gibbs, Jude O'Kain et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 32 citations
- A Taxonomy of C Decompiler Fidelity IssuesLuke Dramko, Jeremy Lacomis, Edward J. Schwartz, Bogdan Vasilescu et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 23 citations
- ReSym: Harnessing LLMs to Recover Variable and Data Structure Symbols from Stripped BinariesDanning Xie, Zhuo Zhang, Nan Jiang, Xiangzhe Xu et al.CCS 2024 · 21 citations
- Interdisciplinary Approaches to Cybervulnerability Impact Assessment for Energy Critical InfrastructureAndrea Gallardo, Robert Erbes, Katya Le Blanc, Lujo Bauer et al.CHI 2024 · 7 citations
- Decompiling the Synergy: An Empirical Study of Human-LLM Teaming in Software Reverse EngineeringZion Leonahenahe Basque, Samuele Doria, Ananta Soneji, Wil Gibbs et al.NDSS 2026 · 7 citations
Builds on4
- Hackers vs. Testers: A Comparison of Software Vulnerability Discovery ProcessesDaniel Votipka, Rock Stevens, Elissa M. Redmiles, Jeremy Hu et al.S&P 2018 · 151 citations
- Program Comprehension and Code Complexity Metrics: An fMRI StudyNorman Peitek, Sven Apel, Chris Parnin, André Brechmann et al.ICSE 2021 · 59 citations
- Rise of the HaCRS: Augmenting Autonomous Cyber Reasoning Systems with Human AssistanceYan Shoshitaishvili, Michael Weissbacher, Lukas Dresel, Christopher Salls et al.CCS 2017 · 57 citations
- An Observational Investigation of Reverse Engineers' ProcessesDaniel Votipka, Seth M. Rabin, Kristopher K. Micinski, Jeffrey S. Foster et al.USENIX Security 2020
Related papers
- ReverSim: An Open-Source Environment for the Controlled Study of Human Aspects in Hardware Reverse EngineeringSteffen Becker, René Walendy, Markus Weber, Carina Wiesen et al.CHI 2025 · 1 citation
- Decomperson: How Humans Decompile and What We Can Learn From ItKevin Burk, Fabio Pagani, Christopher Kruegel, Giovanni VignaUSENIX Security 2022
- Analyzing Bytes: Pre-Disassembly Static Binary AnalysisHuan Nguyen, Soumyakant Priyadarshan, Chencheng Jiang, R. SekarPLDI 2026
- SoK: All You Ever Wanted to Know About x86/x64 Binary Disassembly But Were Afraid to AskChengbin Pang, Ruotong Yu, Yaohui Chen, Eric Koskinen et al.S&P 2021 · 102 citations
- CP-BCS: Binary Code Summarization Guided by Control Flow Graph and Pseudo CodeTong Ye, Lingfei Wu, Tengfei Ma, Xuhong Zhang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 4 citations
