On the Benefits of Public Representations for Private Transfer Learning under Distribution Shift
Pratiksha Thaker, Amrith Setlur, Steven Z. Wu, Virginia Smith
Abstract
Public pretraining is a promising approach to improve differentially private model training. However, recent work has noted that many positive research results studying this paradigm only consider in-distribution tasks, and may not apply to settings where there is distribution shift between the pretraining and finetuning data -- a scenario that is likely when finetuning private tasks due to the sensitive nature of the data. In this work, we show empirically across three tasks that even in settings with large distribution shift, where both zero-shot performance from public data and training from scratch with private data give unusably weak results, public features can in fact improve private training accuracy by up to 67% over private training from scratch. We provide a theoretical explanation for this phenomenon, showing that if the public and private data share a low-dimensional representation, public representations can improve the sample complexity of private training even if it is impossible to learn the private task from the public data alone. Altogether, our results provide evidence that public data can indeed make private training practical in realistic settings of extreme distribution shift.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a87cac0b-6ece-4934-9809-d75be771d8c6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private LearnersXuechen Li, Florian Tramèr, Percy Liang, Tatsunori HashimotoICLR 2022 · 502 citations
- Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language ModelsDa Yu, Saurabh Naik, Arturs Backurs, Sivakanth Gopi et al.ICLR 2022 · 494 citations
- Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?Matthew Jagielski, Jonathan R. Ullman, Alina OpreaNeurIPS 2020 · 354 citations
- Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)Florian Tramèr, Dan BonehICLR 2021 · 325 citations
Related papers
- Mixed Differential Privacy in Computer VisionAditya Golatkar, Alessandro Achille, Yu-Xiang Wang, Aaron Roth et al.CVPR 2022 · 26 citations
- Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?Arun Ganesh, Mahdi Haghifam, Milad Nasr, Sewoong Oh et al.ICML 2023 · 47 citations
- Not All Tasks Are Born Equal: Understanding Zero-Shot GeneralizationJing Zhou, Zongyu Lin, Yanan Zheng, Jian Li et al.ICLR 2023
- Scalable Differential Privacy With Sparse Network FinetuningZelun Luo, Daniel J. Wu, Ehsan Adeli, Li Fei-FeiCVPR 2021
- Private Zeroth-Order Optimization with Public DataXuchen Gong, Tian LiNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
