Explanation-Guided Fairness Testing through Genetic Algorithm
Ming Fan, Wenying Wei, Wuxia Jin, Zijiang Yang, Ting Liu
Abstract
The fairness characteristic is a critical attribute of trusted AI systems. A plethora of research has proposed diverse methods for individual fairness testing. However, they are suffering from three major limitations, i.e., low efficiency, low effectiveness, and model-specificity. This work proposes ExpGA, an explanationguided fairness testing approach through a genetic algorithm (GA). ExpGA employs the explanation results generated by interpretable methods to collect high-quality initial seeds, which are prone to derive discriminatory samples by slightly modifying feature values. ExpGA then adopts GA to search discriminatory sample candidates by optimizing a fitness value. Benefiting from this combination of explanation results and GA, ExpGA is both efficient and effective to detect discriminatory individuals. Moreover, ExpGA only requires prediction probabilities of the tested model, resulting in a better generalization capability to various models. Experiments on multiple real-world benchmarks, including tabular and text datasets, show that ExpGA presents higher efficiency and effectiveness than four state-of-the-art approaches.
• Software and its engineering → Software creation and management.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a86a4b6e-df19-4c4e-ad31-932448e1f5e1Cited by top-tier papers14
- Information-Theoretic Testing and Debugging of Fairness Defects in Deep Neural NetworksVerya Monjezi, Ashutosh Trivedi, Gang Tan, Saeid Tizpaz-NiariICSE 2023 · 47 citations
- Latent Imitator: Generating Natural Individual Discriminatory Instances for Black-Box Fairness TestingYisong Xiao, Aishan Liu, Tianlin Li, Xianglong LiuISSTA 2023 · 31 citations
- FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender SystemsHuizhong Guo, Jinfeng Li, Jingyi Wang, Xiangyu Liu et al.ISSTA 2023 · 11 citations
- MAFT: Efficient Model-Agnostic Fairness Testing for Deep Neural Networks via Zero-Order Gradient SearchZhaohui Wang, Min Zhang, Jingran Yang, Bojie Shao et al.ICSE 2024 · 6 citations
- FINER: Enhancing State-of-the-art Classifiers with Feature Attribution to Facilitate Security AnalysisYiling He, Jian Lou, Zhan Qin, Kui RenCCS 2023 · 6 citations
Builds on3
- LEMNA: Explaining Deep Learning based Security ApplicationsWenbo Guo, Dongliang Mu, Jun Xu, Purui Su et al.CCS 2018 · 336 citations
- Bias in machine learning software: why? how? what to do?Joymallya Chakraborty, Suvodeep Majumder, Tim MenziesFSE 2021 · 186 citations
- White-box fairness testing through adversarial samplingPeixin Zhang, Jingyi Wang, Jun Sun, Guoliang Dong et al.ICSE 2020 · 127 citations
Related papers
- Approximation-guided Fairness Testing through Discriminatory Space AnalysisZhenjiang Zhao, Takahisa Toda, Takashi KitamuraASE 2024
- Efficient white-box fairness testing through gradient searchLingfeng Zhang, Yueling Zhang, Min ZhangISSTA 2021 · 51 citations
- Dissecting Global Search: A Simple Yet Effective Method to Boost Individual Discrimination Testing and RepairLili Quan, Tianlin Li, Xiaofei Xie, Zhenpeng Chen et al.ICSE 2025 · 2 citations
- Fairness Testing Through Extreme Value TheoryVerya Monjezi, Ashutosh Trivedi, Vladik Kreinovich, Saeid Tizpaz-NiariICSE 2025 · 4 citations
- Fairway: a way to build fair ML softwareJoymallya Chakraborty, Suvodeep Majumder, Zhe Yu, Tim MenziesFSE 2020 · 131 citations
