Detecting Misbehaviors of Large Vision-Language Models by Evidential Uncertainty Quantification
Tao Huang, Rui Wang, Xiaofei Liu, Yi Qin, Li Duan, Liping Jing
Abstract
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved substantial advances in multimodal understanding. However, when presented with blackchallenging or distribution-shifted inputs, they frequently produce unreliable or even harmful content, blacksuch as hallucinations or toxic responses. We refer to such misalignments with human expectations as misbehaviors of LVLMs, which raise serious concerns for their deployment in critical applications. blackExisting research have disclosed that such misbehaviors are closely linked to model uncertainty. We find they primarily stem from two distinct sources of epistemic uncertainty: internal contradictions (conflict) and the absence of supporting information (ignorance). While existing uncertainty quantification methods typically capture only total predictive uncertainty, they struggle to distinguish between these underlying causes. To address this gap, we propose Evidential Uncertainty Quantification (EUQ), blacka training-free framework that explicitly decomposes epistemic uncertainty into conflict (CF) and ignorance (IG). Specifically, we interpret features from the model output head as either supporting (positive) or opposing (negative) evidence. Leveraging Dempster-Shafer Theory of belief functions, we aggregate this evidence to quantify internal conflict and knowledge gaps within a single forward pass. We extensively evaluate EUQ across four misbehavior categories, including hallucinations, jailbreaks, adversarial vulnerabilities, and out-of-distribution (OOD) failures using state-of-the-art LVLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that EUQ consistently outperforms strong baselines, blackachieving relative improvements of up to 10.5% in AUROC. blackOur evaluation further reveals that hallucinations correspond to high internal conflict and OOD failures to high ignorance. blackFurthermore, a layer-wise evidential uncertainty dynamics analysis provides a novel perspective on the evolution of internal representations. The source code is available at https://github.com/HT86159/EUQ.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a7dbfda4-9dc0-42e5-8c08-5ec3db22e121Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on38
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMsMiao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinyang Lu, Yifei Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 867 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- nocaps: novel object captioning at scaleHarsh Agrawal, Peter Anderson, Karan Desai, Yufei Wang et al.ICCV 2019 · 631 citations
Related papers
- Not All Inconsistency Is Equal: Decomposing LVLM Uncertainty into Belief Divergence and Belief ConflictJie Shi, Xiaodong Yue, Wei Liu, Yufei Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- On Epistemic Uncertainty of Visual Tokens for Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language ModelsHoigi Seo, Dong Un Kang, Hyunjin Cho, Joohoon Lee et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLM: Iterative Prompting for Estimating Epistemic UncertaintyYasin Abbasi-Yadkori, Ilja Kuzborskij, András György, Csaba SzepesváriNeurIPS 2024
- Enhancing Vision-Language Model Reliability with Uncertainty-Guided Dropout DecodingYixiong Fang, Ziran Yang, Zhaorun Chen, Zhuokai Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 21 citations
- A Head to Predict and a Head to Question: Pre-trained Uncertainty Quantification Heads for Hallucination Detection in LLM OutputsArtem Shelmanov, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Akim Tsvigun, Ivan Tsvigun et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
